ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Automated Bone Marrow Cell Classification for Haematological Disease Diagnosis Using Siamese Neural Network.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable deep learning framework for multiclass bone marrow cytomorphology classification using EfficientNet and post hoc visualization techniques.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Automated bone marrow cell classification using ensemble learning: performance, generalization, and clinical interpretability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning in bone marrow cytomorphology: advances in segmentation, classification, and clinical translation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Improved leukocyte classification in bone marrow cytology using convolutional neural network with contrast enhancement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multimodal representations of transfer learning with snake optimization algorithm on bone marrow cell classification using biomedical histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Engineered feature embeddings meet deep learning: A novel strategy to improve bone marrow cell classification and model transparency.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Models for the marrow: A comprehensive review of AI-based cell classification methods and malignancy detection in bone marrow aspirate smears.HemaSphere · 2024Review
- Neutrophil nucleus: shaping the past and the future.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The critical structure and nature of different bone marrow cells which form a base in the diagnosis of haematological ailments requires a high-grade classification which is a very prolonged approach and accounts for human error if performed manually, even by field experts. Therefore, the aim of this research is to automate the process to study and accurately classify the structure of bone marrow cells which will help in the diagnosis of haematological ailments at a much faster and better rate. Various machine learning algorithms and models, such as CNN + SVM, CNN + XGB Boost and Siamese network, were trained and tested across a dataset of 170,000 expert-annotated cell images from 945 patients' bone marrow smears with haematological disorders. The metrics used for evaluation of this research are accuracy of model, precision and recall of all the different classes of cells. Based on these performance metrics the CNN + SVM, CNN + XGB, resulted in 32%, 28% accuracy, respectively, and therefore these models were discarded. Siamese neural resulted in 91% accuracy and 84% validation accuracy. Moreover, the weighted average recall values of the Siamese neural network were 92% for training and 91% for validation. Hence, the final results are based on Siamese neural network model as it was outperforming all the other algorithms used in this research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.