Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611532›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Etelcalcetide and Paricalcitol in Chronic Kidney Disease: When the Target Is Inflammation.

Luis D'Marco, Ana Checa-Ros, Dionilux Gamero, Carlos Soto, Juan Salazar, Manuel Nava, Valmore Bermúdez, Fabiola Dapena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Luis D'MarcoDepartment of Medicine & Surgery, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Carrer Lluis Vives, 1, 46115 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-891X
Ana Checa-RosDepartment of Medicine & Surgery, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Carrer Lluis Vives, 1, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Dionilux GameroParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu, Medicine Department, Carrer Antoni Pujadas, 08830 Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos SotoConsorci Sanitari del Alt Penedes-Garraf, Nephrology Department, 08720 Barcelona, Spain.
Juan SalazarFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4211-528X
Manuel NavaEndocrine and Metabolic Disease Research Center, School of Medicine, University of Zulia, Maracaibo 4004, Venezuela.ORCID 0000-0001-9769-1693
Valmore BermúdezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1880-8887
Fabiola DapenaFundación Renal Iñigo Alvarez de Toledo, 28003 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversidad Simón Bolívar · COConsorci Sanitari Garraf · ESFundación Renal Española · ESParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ESUniversidad del Zulia · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) is frequent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in those in dialysis. To treat this complication, the current options available include phosphorus restriction, phosphate binders, the inhibition of parathyroid hormone (PTH) synthesis and secretion by the supplementation of vitamin D or VDR activators, or the use of calcimimetics. Beyond the control of PTH, the effects of the treatment of SHP on other biomarkers of risk may represent an additional benefit for this population. In this study, we explore the benefits of current SHP treatment options, mainly paricalcitol and/or etelcalcetide in the inflammatory state of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Results: the study finally included 142 maintenance HD patients (5 patients were excluded) followed for 6 months (dialysis vintage 26 ± 30 months, mean age 70 years old, 73% women, 81% Spanish white, 47% diabetic). In this case, 52 patients were on regular treatment with paricalcitol for SHP and 25 patients were eligible to initiate etelcalcetide. The baseline serum levels of Ca, P, PTH, Ferritin, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and other variables were measured. We found serum PTH levels showed an improvement after the treatment with etelcalcetide again paricalcitol and no treatment (p < 0.04). Of note, serum levels of CRP were significantly lower in a small group of patients (n = 11) receiving paricalcitol + etelcalcetide compared to paricalcitol or etelcalcetide alone. The proportion of patients with CRP within target ranges (≤1.0 mg/dL) increased significantly after combined treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: etelcalcetide proved to safely reduce the PTH levels without significant adverse events and the possibility of a synergic anti-inflammatory effect with the simultaneous use of Paricalcitol in HD patients.

Indexed as

calcimimeticschronic kidney diseaseinflammationvitamin D analogs

Identifiers

PMID36611532
PMCPMC9818894
OpenAlexW4313245959

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.