Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611601›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

CanCOG

Ana F Oliveira, Milaydis Sosa-Napolskij, Ana Torres, Diâner Felipe Queiroz, Ana Bártolo, Helena Sousa, Sara Monteiro, Kathleen Van Dyk, Linda M Ercoli, Isabel M Santos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07755839 (CanCOG® - Cognitive Rehabilitation in Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07755839 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CanCOG® - Cognitive Rehabilitation in Cancer: A Protocol for a Multicenter Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With Non-central Nervous System Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAveiro UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsCancer-related Cognitive Impairment, Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction, Cancer-related Cognitive Difficulties, Depression and Anxiety SymptomsArmsCanCOG® - Cogntive Rehabilitation in Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Remote group intervention for adults with cancer-related cognitive impairment: a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana F OliveiraCenter for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-7361
Milaydis Sosa-NapolskijCenter for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2521-0616
Ana TorresCenter for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Diâner Felipe QueirozDepartment of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5228-2973
Ana BártoloCenter for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Piaget Institute-ISEIT/Viseu, 3515-776 Viseu, Portugal.
Helena SousaCenter for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0832-0004
Sara MonteiroCenter for Health Technology and Services Research of the Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Kathleen Van DykDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Linda M ErcoliDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Isabel M SantosWilliam James Center for Research (WJCR), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Centre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PTUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversidade Aberta · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/138785/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive difficulties are highly prevalent and negatively impact cancer survivors' quality of life. The UCLA Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention Program (in short, UCLA program) is an evidence-based intervention developed and tested in the US to address the cognitive complaints of cancer survivors. Since there are no cognitive rehabilitation programs available for Portuguese cancer-related settings, this study aimed to culturally adapt the UCLA program to Portugal. Nine steps were implemented for this cultural adaptation: needs assessment, initial contacts, translation, cultural adaptation, independent review by a panel of experts (n = 6), focus group discussions with cancer survivors (n = 11), systematization of inputs and improvement of the final materials, fidelity check, and preliminary acceptability assessment. The findings suggested that changes to the original materials were needed. A Portuguese name, "CanCOG

Indexed as

cancercancer-related cognitive impairmentcancer survivorscognitive rehabilitationcultural adaptation

Identifiers

PMID36611601
PMCPMC9819200
OpenAlexW4313471762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.