Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36613221›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Metabolomics Characterize the Differential Metabolic Markers between Bama Xiang Pig and Debao Pig to Identify Pork.

Changyi Chen, Junwen Zheng, Chenyong Xiong, Hongjin Zhou, Chuntao Wei, Xin Hu, Xinxiu Qian, Mengyi He, Yandi Shi, Yuwen Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Isolation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Changyi ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Junwen ZhengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Chenyong XiongCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Hongjin ZhouCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Chuntao WeiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Xin HuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Xinxiu QianCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Mengyi HeCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Yandi ShiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.
Yuwen LiuShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics of MARA, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China.
Zongqiang LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7489-0005
Guangxi University · CNAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CN

Funding

Bama county program for talents in science and technology AE33400261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bama Xiang pig (BM) is a unique pig species in Guangxi Province, China. Compared to other breeds of domestic pig, such as the Debao pig (DB), it is smaller in size, better in meat quality, resistant to rough feeding and strong in stress resistance. These unique advantages of Bama Xiang pigs make them of great edible value and scientific research value. However, the differences in muscle metabolites between Bama Xiang pigs (BM) and Debao pigs (DB) are largely unexplored. Here, we identified 214 differential metabolites between these two pig breeds by LC-MS. Forty-one such metabolites are enriched into metabolic pathways, and these metabolites correspond to 11 metabolic pathways with significant differences. In Bama pigs, the abundance of various metabolites such as creatine, citric acid, L-valine and hypoxanthine is significantly higher than in Debao pigs, while the abundance of other metabolites, such as carnosine, is significantly lower. Among these, we propose six differential metabolites: L-proline, citric acid, ribose 1-phosphate, L-valine, creatine, and L-arginine, as well as four potential differential metabolites (without the KEGG pathway), alanyl-histidine, inosine 2'-phosphate, oleoylcarnitine, and histidinyl hydroxyproline, as features for evaluating the meat quality of Bama pigs and for differentiating pork from Bama pigs and Debao pigs. This study provides a proof-of-concept example of distinguishing pork from different pig breeds at the metabolite level and sheds light on elucidating the biological processes underlying meat quality differences. Our pork metabolites data are also of great value to the genomics breeding community in meat quality improvement.

Indexed as

Bama pigdifferential metabolitesidentificationLC-MSmeat quality

Identifiers

PMID36613221
PMCPMC9818558
OpenAlexW4313468624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.