Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614862›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia in Patients with Advanced Prostate Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Pedro de Pablos-Rodríguez, Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño, Diego Infante-Ventura, Aythami de Armas-Castellano, Miguel Ramírez Backhaus, Juan Francisco Loro Ferrer, Pedro de Pablos-Velasco, Antonio Rueda-Domínguez, María M Trujillo-Martín

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Correlates and predictors of sarcopenia among men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro de Pablos-RodríguezDepartment of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2286-9893
Tasmania Del Pino-SedeñoCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Diego Infante-VenturaCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-7849
Aythami de Armas-CastellanoCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Miguel Ramírez BackhausDepartment of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain.
Juan Francisco Loro FerrerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-8209
Pedro de Pablos-VelascoDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, 35012 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-2581
Antonio Rueda-DomínguezNetwork for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 38109 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5890-0149
María M Trujillo-MartínCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2273-2192
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESServicio Canario de la Salud · ESFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESRed de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men and the fifth leading cause of death from cancer. The possibility of sarcopenia being a prognostic factor in advanced PCa patients has recently become a subject of interest. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in advanced prostate carcinoma. A systematic review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science (March, 2021). The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analyses for overall, cancer-specific, and progression-free survival were performed. Nine studies (n = 1659) were included. Sarcopenia was borderline associated with a shorter overall survival (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.44, P = 0.04, I2 = 43%) but was significantly associated with progression-free survival (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.06, P < 0.01; k = 3; n = 588). Available evidence supports sarcopenia as an important prognostic factor of progression-free survival in patients with advanced PCa. However, sarcopenia has a weak association with a shorter overall survival. The evidence on the role of sarcopenia in prostate-cancer-specific survival is insufficient and supports the need for further research. Patient summary: The literature was reviewed to determine whether the loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) affects the survival in patients with advanced PCa. Patients with advanced PCa and sarcopenia were found to have a shorter progression-free survival (the length of time during and after treatment of a cancer that the patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse), but sarcopenia did not have much influence on the overall survival and cancer-specific survival (the length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment to the date of death due to the cancer).

Indexed as

meta-analysisprognosisprostatic neoplasmssarcopeniasurvivalsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36614862
PMCPMC9821501
OpenAlexW4313511295

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.