Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614980›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Towards an Established Intraoperative Oncological Favorable Tool: Results of Fluorescein-Guided Resection from a Monocentric, Prospective Series of 93 Primary Glioblastoma Patients.

Jacopo Falco, Emanuele Rubiu, Morgan Broggi, Mariangela Farinotti, Ignazio G Vetrano, Marco Schiariti, Elena Anghileri, Marica Eoli, Bianca Pollo, Marco Moscatelli and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Next-generation agents for fluorescence-guided glioblastoma surgery.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jacopo FalcoNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6933-7328
Emanuele RubiuNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-5348
Morgan BroggiNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8818-1317
Mariangela FarinottiNeuroepidemiology Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Ignazio G VetranoNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-9700
Marco SchiaritiNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Elena AnghileriUnit of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Marica EoliUnit of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4744-9377
Bianca PolloNeuropathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-4256
Marco MoscatelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6745-474X
Francesco RestelliNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3789-957X
Elio MazzapicchiNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7043-9233
Emanuele La CorteNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-8629
Giulio BonomoNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4749-7929
Marco GemmaNeurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Giovanni BroggiNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Paolo FerroliNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Francesco AcerbiNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-3924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly reported that maximizing surgical resection of contrast-enhancing regions in patients with glioblastoma improves overall survival. Efforts to achieve an improved rate of resection have included several tools: among those, the recent widespread of fluorophores. Sodium fluorescein is an unspecific, vascular dye which tends to accumulate in areas with an altered blood-brain barrier. In this retrospective analysis of patients prospectively enrolled in the FLUOCERTUM study, we aimed to assess the role of fluorescein-guided surgery on surgical radicality, survival, and morbidity. A retrospective review based on 93 consecutively and prospectively enrolled IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients (2016-2022) was performed; fluorescence characteristics, rate of resection, clinical outcome, and survival were analyzed. No side effect related to fluorescein occurred; all of the tumors presented a strong yellow-green enhancement and fluorescein was judged fundamental in distinguishing tumors from viable tissue in all cases. Gross total resection was achieved in 77 cases out of 93 patients (82.8%). After a mean follow-up time of 17.4 months (3-78 months), the median progression-free survival was 12 months, with a PFS-6 and PFS-12 of 94.2% and 50%, respectively, whereas median overall survival was estimated to be 16 months; survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 91.8%, 72.3%, and 30.1%, respectively. Based on these results, we can assert that the fluorescein-guided technique is a safe and valuable method for patients harboring a newly diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma.

Indexed as

fluorescence-guided neurosurgeryglioblastomagross total resectionneuro-oncologyoverall survivalsodium fluoresceinYELLOW 560 filter

Identifiers

PMID36614980
PMCPMC9820993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.