ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Classification of solid pulmonary nodules using a machine-learning nomogram based on
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a clinical prediction model for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules with a CTR ≥ 50% utilizing artificial intelligence-driven radiomics analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Radiomics Features of Mediastinal Fat and Pulmonary Nodules on Lung CT Images Distinguish Benignancy and Malignancy.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Dual-layer detector spectral CT-based machine learning models in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Classification of Pulmonary Nodules in 2-[Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Development of a combined radiomics and CT feature-based model for differentiating malignant from benign subcentimeter solid pulmonary nodules.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- PET/CT radiomics and deep learning in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: progress and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and validate an Methods: A total of 280 patients with BPN (n=128) or MPN (n=152) were collected retrospectively and randomized into the training set (n=196) and validation set (n=84). Pretherapeutic clinicobiological markers, PET/CT metabolic features and radiomic features were analyzed and selected to develop prediction models by the machine-learning method [Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression]. These prediction models were validated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Then, the factors of the model with the optimal predictive efficiency were used to constructed a nomogram to provide a visually quantitative tool for distinguishing BPN from MPN patients. Results: We developed 3 independent models (Clinical Model, Radiomics Model and Combined Model) to distinguish patients with BPN from those with MPN in the training set. The Combined Model was validated to hold the optimal efficiency and clinical utility with the lowest false positive rate (FPR) in classifying the solid pulmonary nodules in two sets (AUCs of 0.91 and 0.94, FPRs of 18.68% and 5.41%, respectively; P<0.05). Thus, the quantitative nomogram was developed based on the Combined Model, and a good consistency between the predictions and the actual observations was validated by the calibration curves. Conclusions: This study presents a machine-learning nomogram integrated clinico-biologico-radiological features that can improve the efficiency and reduce the FPR in the noninvasive differentiation of BPN from MPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.