Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618813›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Classification of solid pulmonary nodules using a machine-learning nomogram based on

Caiyue Ren, Mingxia Xu, Jiangang Zhang, Fuquan Zhang, Shaoli Song, Yun Sun, Kailiang Wu, Jingyi Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Classification of Pulmonary Nodules in 2-[Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caiyue Ren *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Mingxia Xu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiangang ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Fuquan ZhangCollege of Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shaoli SongShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Yun SunShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Kailiang WuShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Jingyi ChengShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To develop and validate an Methods: A total of 280 patients with BPN (n=128) or MPN (n=152) were collected retrospectively and randomized into the training set (n=196) and validation set (n=84). Pretherapeutic clinicobiological markers, PET/CT metabolic features and radiomic features were analyzed and selected to develop prediction models by the machine-learning method [Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression]. These prediction models were validated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Then, the factors of the model with the optimal predictive efficiency were used to constructed a nomogram to provide a visually quantitative tool for distinguishing BPN from MPN patients. Results: We developed 3 independent models (Clinical Model, Radiomics Model and Combined Model) to distinguish patients with BPN from those with MPN in the training set. The Combined Model was validated to hold the optimal efficiency and clinical utility with the lowest false positive rate (FPR) in classifying the solid pulmonary nodules in two sets (AUCs of 0.91 and 0.94, FPRs of 18.68% and 5.41%, respectively; P<0.05). Thus, the quantitative nomogram was developed based on the Combined Model, and a good consistency between the predictions and the actual observations was validated by the calibration curves. Conclusions: This study presents a machine-learning nomogram integrated clinico-biologico-radiological features that can improve the efficiency and reduce the FPR in the noninvasive differentiation of BPN from MPN.

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)machine learningnomogramradiomicsSolid pulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID36618813
PMCPMC9816842

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.