Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620239›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Evolutionary game analysis of community elderly care service regulation in the context of "Internet +".

Qiangxiang Wang, June Liu, Yue Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiangxiang WangDepartment of Logistics and E-Commerce, School of Economics and Management, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
June LiuDepartment of Logistics and E-Commerce, School of Economics and Management, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Yue ZhengDepartment of Logistics and E-Commerce, School of Economics and Management, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As an upgraded form of the elderly care service industry, "Internet + Community Elderly Care" integrates information technology, artificial intelligence, Internet thinking, and the construction of community elderly care service mechanisms. Research on "Internet + Community Elderly Care" has become a focus. Methods: The four-party evolutionary game model of elderly service regulations was presented, which consists of the government, providers, platforms, and elderly people. By using Lyapunov stability theory, the stability of each player's strategy selection was analyzed. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of the key parameters was discussed in detail using system dynamics. Results and discussion: Online evaluations of elderly people have more positive effects on the regulatory system than offline evaluations. Both the penalties on providers and subsidies on platforms given by the government have thresholds. Moreover, government penalties for providers and subsidies for platforms could curb their speculative behavior and enable effective steering of providers and platforms. Conclusion: The Omni-feedback mechanism for elderly people can effectively curb the speculative behavior of elderly care service providers and elderly care service information platforms. The government should dynamically adjust penalties and subsidy policies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIndustryAgedGovernmentHumanscommunity elderly careevolutionary gamefeedback mechanismservice regulationsystem dynamics

Identifiers

PMID36620239
PMCPMC9815532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.