ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Akathisia after chronic usage of synthetic cathinones: A case study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methamphetamine and α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP) intravenous self-administration in female and male rats.Psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Methamphetamine and α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP) Intravenous Self-Administration in Female and Male Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Synthetic cathinones are a heterogenous group of new psychoactive substances (NPS) with a surging prevalence of use. They are sold under the name of "Bath Salts," "Legal Highs" or "Research Chemical." It is a heterogeneous group of substances that have a varying binding selectivity and affinity. Due to limited availability of NPS screening tests, inadequate legislation, the exponential increases in availability of new NPS and the comorbid use of other illicit substances, scientific research remains scarce. As a result, insight in their mental and psychomotor effects is limited. Case description: We present a case of a 21-year-old woman with daily usage of synthetic cathinones, more specifically α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP-better known as "Flakka"), α-Pyrrolidinohexiophenone (α-PHP) and alpha-Pyrrolidinoisohexaphenone (α-PHiP). Besides a severe paranoid psychotic state of mind, characterized by persecutory and somatic delusions, there was also a very pronounced psychomotor restlessness during the whole period of hospitalization which was diagnosed as akathisia. She reported that she was unable to sit during meals, had difficulty standing still and felt a constant urge to pay attention to the restlessness. The patient did not take any antipsychotic medication at admission. Results: The patient was treated in accordance with the current guidelines concerning akathisia with a combination of Quetiapine 200 mg, Propranolol 80 mg, Diazepam 10 mg, Biperiden 4 mg, and Mirtazapine 15 mg without any sufficient alleviation of complaints. Before the start of the treatment, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) score was 11 out of 14 which evolved toward a score of 7 over the course of the 40 day hospitalization, implying persisting severe akathisia which only improved modestly. Conclusion: The current case suggests that besides cocaine, amphetamines and methamphetamines, synthetic cathinones can also increase the risk for development of extrapyramidal symptoms such as akathisia. Especially a-PVP-analogs as used by the current patient and Pyrovalerone-analogs such as Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) are very powerful dopamine reuptake-inhibitors which might lead to strong locomotor activation. Up to this day it remains very difficult to establish a guideline concerning the treatment of intoxication with synthetic cathinones or dependence thereof.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.