Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620832›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Impacts of Skin Eccrine Glands on the Measured Values of Transepidermal Water Loss.

Hailey Schwab, Jamie Flora, Harvey N Mayrovitz

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hailey SchwabOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Jamie FloraOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Harvey N MayrovitzMedical Education, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Nova Southeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is widely used to assess and quantify skin insensible water loss to assess skin's barrier function integrity. Low TEWL values are normally indicative of intact skin and a healthy functional barrier, whereas an increased TEWL reveals a disturbed or disrupted skin barrier. Because most skin sites at which these measurements are made have eccrine glands present, the contribution of the sweat gland activity to these measurements is variable and, in most cases, unknown. The separation between the contribution of water loss that is reflective of the skin barrier integrity versus that contributed via eccrine activation is not easy and is made more difficult since both components increase with increasing skin and environmental temperature. Endogenous factors that impact eccrine sweat gland activity include sympathetic nervous system activity, emotional stress, physical activity, eccrine gland density, and age. Exogenous factors that impact eccrine gland activity include ambient temperature and humidity and the climate where one resides. The aforementioned variables impact eccrine gland activity positively or negatively and therefore alter TEWL values accordingly. Although it may be theoretically possible to control all these factors, the difficulty in doing so results in only a few being controlled during most TEWL measurements. Such confounding processes may have impacted historical TEWL reference ranges and values previously reported. Thus, the impact of eccrine activation on standardly measured TEWL values is at this juncture unclear and may be a component contributing to some reported variability in TEWL values. To help clarify the issues, a literature review was conducted to investigate and summarize relevant prior research efforts and outcomes with respect to ways to consider eccrine activity in TEWL measurements and estimate the contribution of eccrine gland activity to TEWL values. Online databases such as Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Public/Publisher Medline (PubMed), Elton B. Stephans Company (EBSCO), Google Scholar, and Wiley Online Library were searched with "transepidermal water loss" or "TEWL" in the title combined with "eccrine glands" or "sweat" anywhere in the text. The present findings indicate a multiplicity of biological and environmental variables impacting eccrine gland activity and thereby potentially affecting measured TEWL values. Even if laboratory conditions adhere to various guidelines and recommendations, it is not yet possible to separate the eccrine activation component from the parameter of true interest in the assessment of the skin's physiological barrier function except for full gland deactivation. The amount that such eccrine gland activation impacts the measured value of TEWL is generally not determined using currently available methods and the only sure way to eliminate a confounding effect is to inactivate the glands during such TEWL measurements. Because such eccrine gland deactivating approach is not usually desirable or even possible, other approaches would be recommended. One would be the development of a measuring device that could distinguish between the component of TEWL that is associated with the skin barrier function and the other that is attributable to sweat gland activation. Further research and development along these lines appear warranted.

Indexed as

eccrine glandhyperhidrosisscopolamineskin barriersweat glandsweat water losstewltransepidermal water loss

Identifiers

PMID36620832
PMCPMC9815790
OpenAlexW4311660356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.