Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624079›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2023

Efficacy of personal protective equipment to prevent environmental infection of COVID-19 among healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Sani Rachman Soleman, Zhaoqing Lyu, Takuya Okada, Mariko Harada Sassa, Yukiko Fujii, Manal A M Mahmoud, Daniel K Ebner, Kouji H Harada

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sani Rachman SolemanDepartment of Health and Environmental Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Zhaoqing LyuDepartment of Health and Environmental Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takuya OkadaDepartment of Health and Environmental Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Mariko Harada SassaDepartment of Health and Environmental Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Yukiko FujiiDaiichi University of Pharmacy.
Manal A M MahmoudFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University.
Daniel K EbnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic.
Kouji H HaradaDepartment of Health and Environmental Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-123X
Kyoto University · JPAssiut University · EGDaiichi University of Pharmacy · JPMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) employed personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, crucial to protecting themselves from infection. To highlight the efficacy of PPE in preventing environmental infection among HCWs, a systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidance.

methodsA search of the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted from January 2019 to April 2021 using pre-defined search terms. Articles were screened by three researchers. The approved papers were read in full and included in this review if relevance was mutually agreed upon. Data were extracted by study design and types of PPEs.

results47 of 108 identified studies met the inclusion criteria, with seven reviews and meta-analyses, seven cohort, nine case-control, fifteen cross-sectional studies, four before and after, four case series, and one modeling studies. Wearing PPE offered COVID-19 protection in HCWs but required adequate training. Wearing surgical masks provided improved protection over cloth masks, while the benefit of powered air-purifying respirators is less clear, as are individual gowns, gloves, and/or face shields.

conclusionsWearing PPE, especially facial masks, is necessary among HCWs, while training in proper use of PPE is also important to prevent COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentCOVID-19Environmental infectionFacial masksHealthcare workersPersonal protective equipment

Identifiers

PMID36624079
PMCPMC9845060
OpenAlexW4313613588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.