ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023
Concepts, utilization, and perspectives on the Dutch Nationwide Trauma registry: a position paper.
Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policymaking, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Pooled it
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
- The potential impact of changing the Norwegian trauma Registry inclusion criteria for patients not admitted with trauma team activation: Identifying patient groups to be excluded and considering potential risks.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- New Max Verstappen's on the Rise?: Go-Kart Incidents in a Level-I Trauma Center in the Netherlands.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Interpreting traumatic brain injury severity: analysis of the correlation between Glasgow coma scale and abbreviated injury scale.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- The Norwegian national trauma registry: development process and essential data insights.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Is there a difference between the incidence of subtypes of tibial plateau fractures between six different level 1, level 2 and level 3 trauma centers in the Netherlands?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Outcome of severely injured patients in a unique trauma system with 24/7 double trauma surgeon on-call service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Trauma registries: towards global standardisation and outcome evaluation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decades, the Dutch trauma care have seen major improvements. To assess the performance of the Dutch trauma system, in 2007, the Dutch Nationwide Trauma Registry (DNTR) was established, which developed into rich source of information for quality assessment, quality improvement of the trauma system, and for research purposes. The DNTR is one of the most comprehensive trauma registries in the world as it includes 100% of all trauma patients admitted to the hospital through the emergency department. This inclusive trauma registry has shown its benefit over less inclusive systems; however, it comes with a high workload for high-quality data collection and thus more expenses. The comprehensive prospectively collected data in the DNTR allows multiple types of studies to be performed. Recent changes in legislation allow the DNTR to include the citizen service numbers, which enables new possibilities and eases patient follow-up. However, in order to maximally exploit the possibilities of the DNTR, further development is required, for example, regarding data quality improvement and routine incorporation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. This would improve the quality assessment and scientific output from the DNTR. Finally, the DNTR and all other (European) trauma registries should strive to ensure that the trauma registries are eligible for comparisons between countries and healthcare systems, with the goal to improve trauma patient care worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.