Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624508›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2023

'We don't live in a harm reduction world, we live in a prohibition world': tensions arising in the design of drug alerts.

Isabelle Volpe, Rita Brien, Jasmin Grigg, Stephanie Tzanetis, Sione Crawford, Tom Lyons, Nicole Lee, Ginny McKinnon, Caitlin Hughes, Alan Eade and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Opioid-related deaths in Northern Ontario in the early COVID-19 pandemic period.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  6. Responding to reports of nitazene toxicity in Australia.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isabelle VolpeSocial and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rita BrienTurning Point, Eastern Health Statewide Services, Richmond, Australia.
Jasmin GriggTurning Point, Eastern Health Statewide Services, Richmond, Australia.
Stephanie TzanetisCanTEST (Direction Health Services, Pill Testing Australia, Canberra Alliance for Harm Minimisation and Advocacy), Canberra, Australia.
Sione CrawfordCanTEST (Direction Health Services, Pill Testing Australia, Canberra Alliance for Harm Minimisation and Advocacy), Canberra, Australia.
Tom LyonsDepartment of Health, Victoria State Government, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicole Lee360Edge, Melbourne, Australia.
Ginny McKinnonDepartment of Health, Victoria State Government, Melbourne, Australia.
Caitlin HughesLaw and Commerce, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Alan EadeSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Monica J BarrattSocial and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. monica.barratt@rmit.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug alerts designed for health and community workforces have potential to avert acute harms associated with unpredictable illicit drug markets, by preparing workers to respond to unusual drug-related events, and distribute information to service users. However, the design of such alerts is complicated by diverse needs of individuals, and broader socio-political contexts. Here, we discuss the tensions that arose in the process of co-designing drug alert templates with health and community workers.

methodsWe conducted five in-depth digital co-design workshops with 31 workers employed in alcohol and other drug and urgent care settings. Our approach to analysis was informed by Iterative Categorisation and reflexive thematic analysis methods.

resultsWe identified five key tensions. First, there is a need to provide comprehensive information to meet the information needs of a diverse group of workers with varying knowledge levels, while also designing alerts to be clear, concise, and relevant to the work of individuals. Second, it is important that alerts do not create 'information overload'; however, it is also important that information should be available to those who want it. Third, alert design and dissemination must be perceived to be credible, to avoid 'alert scepticism'; however, credibility is challenging to develop in a broader context of criminalisation, stigmatisation, and sensationalism. Fourth, alerts must be carefully designed to achieve 'intended effects' and avoid unintended effects, while acknowledging that it is impossible to control all potential effects. Finally, while alerts may be intended for an audience of health and community workers, people who use drugs are the end-users and must be kept front of mind in the design process.

conclusionsThe co-design process revealed complexities in designing drug alerts, particularly in the context of stigmatised illicit drug use, workforce diversity, and dissemination strategies. This study has highlighted the value of developing these important risk communication tools with their target audiences to ensure that they are relevant, useful, and impactful. The findings have informed the development of our drug alert prototypes and provide local context to complement existing best-practice risk-communications literature.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionIllicit DrugsCommunicationHumansIllicit DrugsCo-designCredibilityDrug alertsDrug checkingDrug risk communicationEarly warning systemHarm reductionStigmaTensionsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID36624508
PMCPMC9829230

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.