ArticleBiochemia medica2023
Reference intervals for thyroid disorders calculated by indirect method and comparison with reference change values.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age- and Sex-Specific Reference Intervals for TSH, FT4, and FT3 Derived from the Turkish Multi-Center Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Establishing Age- and Sex-Specific Reference Intervals for Thyroid Function Tests in the Older People of Eastern Anatolia: A Population-Based Indirect Approach.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comparison of thyroid hormones reference intervals based on thyroid antibody levels: A multicenter study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Reference Intervals and Cut-Off Values for Thyroid Tests in the Croatian Adult Population on the Snibe MAGLUMI X6 Immunoassay Analyzer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Women-specific reference ranges for serum TSH in Liguria: the impact of age and year of collection in a single-center cross-sectional study.Thyroid research · 2025Article
- Biological variation of thyroid stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine in healthy subjects in Turkey.Biochemia medica · 2025Article
- Reference intervals for thyroid-stimulating hormone in the adult Lebanese population: Results from the last decade.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Thyroid hormone levels among adults in India: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Thyroid Hormone Reference Intervals among Healthy Individuals In Lanzhou, China.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to calculate reference intervals (RIs) for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) and evaluate the clinical significance of these intervals by use of reference change values (RCV) of the analytes. Materials and methods: Laboratory patient data between August and December 2021 were evaluated for the study. A total of 188,912 patients with TSH, fT4, fT3, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (Anti-TPO) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (Anti-Tg) results were evaluated. All measurements were performed on Cobas c801 (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany) using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay technology. Estimated RIs were compared with manufacturer's by means of RCVs of analytes. Results: Thyroid stimulating hormone values didn't differ significantly by gender and age. The combined RIs for whole group (N = 28,437) was found as 0.41-4.37 mIU/mL. Free T4 values (11.6-20.1 pmol/L, N = 13,479 in male; 10.5-19.5 pmol/L, N = 17,634 female) and fT3 values (3.38-6.35 pmol/L, N = 2,516 in male; 3.39-5.99 pmol/L, N = 3,348 pmol/L in female) significantly differed by gender (P < 0.050). Both fT4 and fT3 values also showed significant differences in age subgroups comparisons. So, male and female RIs were represented separately for age subgroups. When compared with manufacturer's RIs, TSH whole group and fT4 subgroups RIs didn't exceed the analytes' RCVs, but this difference was greater for fT3. Conclusions: Reference interval estimation by use of indirect method out of laboratory data may be more accurate than manufacturer provided RIs. This population based RIs evaluated using RCV of analytes may provide useful information in clinical interpretation of laboratory results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.