Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632147›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in endocrine and metabolic research2022

Modelling KNDy neurons and gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generation.

Zoe Plain, Margaritis Voliotis, Craig A McArdle, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zoe PlainDepartment of Mathematics and Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Margaritis VoliotisDepartment of Mathematics and Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Craig A McArdleUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Krasimira Tsaneva-AtanasovaDepartment of Mathematics and Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and its frequency are crucial for healthy reproductive function. To understand what drives GnRH pulses, a combination of experimental and mathematical modelling approaches has been used. Early work focussed on the possibility that GnRH pulse generation is an intrinsic feature of GnRH neurons, with autocrine feedback generating pulsatility. However, there is now ample evidence suggesting that a network of upstream neurons secreting kisspeptin, neurokinin-B and dynorphin are the source of this GnRH pulse generator. The interplay of slow positive and negative feedback via neurokinin-B and dynorphin, respectively, allows the network to act as a relaxation oscillator, driving pulsatile secretion of kisspeptin, and consequently, of GnRH and LH. Here, we review the mathematical modelling approaches exploring both scenarios and suggest that with pulsatile GnRH secretion driven by the KNDy pulse generator, autocrine feedback still has the potential to modulate GnRH output.

Identifiers

PMID36632147
PMCPMC9823092
OpenAlexW4296381279

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.