Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36632151›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2022

Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer in Japan: 'real-world' consideration of the results from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference.

Kazutoshi Fujita, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Nobuyuki Hinata, Yuji Miura, Kohei Edamura, Ken-Ichi Tabata, Gaku Arai, Nobuaki Matsubara, Yota Yasumizu, Takeo Kosaka and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Hiroyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Nobuyuki HinataDepartment of Urology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuji MiuraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei EdamuraDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Ken-Ichi TabataDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Gaku AraiDepartment of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.
Nobuaki MatsubaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Yota YasumizuDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo KosakaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mikio SugimotoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Keio University · JPHiroshima University · JPKagawa University · JPKindai University · JPKitasato University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOkayama University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPToho University · JPToranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to manage advanced prostate cancer. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) in 2019 provided a practical guide to help clinicians consider therapeutic options in controversial areas, but healthcare systems vary across the world. At the 109th annual meeting of the Japanese Urological Association in December 2021, Japanese urologists voted on the questions in the APCCC 2019 guidelines regarding prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), management of oligometastatic prostate cancer, management of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), management of a primary tumor in metastatic settings, systemic treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC), management of metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), and tumor genomic testing. We summarize the "real-world" status of the management of advanced prostate cancer in Japan. Several differences were noted in the management of advanced prostate cancer between Japanese urologists and the APCCC 2019 guidelines. Many Japanese urologists chose conventional imaging modalities for detecting metastasis instead of PSMA-PET. More Japanese urologists prefer androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone in the management of low-volume metastatic CSPC than the APCCC panelists do, In the management of M0 CRPC, darolutamide and enzalutamide were chosen more by Japanese urologists than by the voters at the APCCC 2019. Bicalutamide remains one of the options for the management of mCRPC in Japan. More Japanese urologists do not recommend microsatellite instability (MSI) and

Indexed as

castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)genomic testinghormone-sensitive prostate canceroligometastatic prostate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)

Identifiers

PMID36632151
PMCPMC9827400
OpenAlexW4313456979

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.