Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36633417›Full record

ArticleBJS open2023

Establishment and external validation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in excluding postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Jonathan Garnier, Marie-Sophie Alfano, Fabien Robin, Jacques Ewald, Abdallah Al Farai, Anais Palen, Amine Sebai, Djamel Mokart, Jean-Robert Delpero, Laurent Sulpice and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06141044 (PANDREAS. Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage vs no Drainage After Distal Pancreatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06141044 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

PANDREAS. Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage vs no Drainage After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Multicentre Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2024 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPostoperative Pancreatic Fistula, Distal Pancreatectomy, DrainageArmsAvoid surgical drainage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Value of Blood T Cell Frequencies for Risk Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan GarnierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5481-2926
Marie-Sophie AlfanoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Fabien RobinDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-5351
Jacques EwaldDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Abdallah Al FaraiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-2968
Anais PalenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Amine SebaiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes, France.
Djamel MokartDepartment of Intensive Care, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-463X
Jean-Robert DelperoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Aix-Marseille University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Laurent SulpiceDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Digestive Surgery, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes, France.
Christophe ZemmourDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Biostatistics and Methodology Unit, Aix-Marseille University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Olivier TurriniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Aix-Marseille University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactors excluding postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), facilitating early drain removal and hospital discharge represent a novel approach in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to establish the relevance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in excluding POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

methodsA prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent PD at two high-volume centres was used. Patients were divided into three cohorts (training, internal, and external validation). The primary endpoints of this study were accuracy, optimal timing, and cutoff values of NLR for excluding POPF after PD.

resultsFrom 2012 to 2020, in a 2:1 ratio, 451 consecutive patients were randomly sampled as training (n = 301) and validation (n = 150) cohorts. Additionally, the external validation cohort included 197 patients between 2018 and 2020. POPF was diagnosed in 135 (20.8 per cent) patients. The 90-day mortality rate was 4.1 per cent. NLR less than 8.5 on postoperative day 3 (OR, 95 per cent c.i.) was significantly associated with the absence of POPF in the training (2.41, 1.19 to 4.88; P = 0.015), internal validation (5.59, 2.02 to 15.43; P = 0.001), and external validation (5.13, 1.67 to 15.76; P = 0.004) cohorts when adjusted for relevant clinical factors. Postoperative outcomes significantly differed using this threshold.

conclusionNLR less than 8.5 on postoperative day 3 may be a simple, independent, cost-effective, and easy-to-use criterion for excluding POPF.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsHumansNeutrophilsPancreas

Identifiers

PMID36633417
PMCPMC9835509
OpenAlexW4315707181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.