Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635083›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2023

Using FIGO Nutrition Checklist counselling in pregnancy: A review to support healthcare professionals.

Sarah Louise Killeen, Niamh Donnellan, Sharleen L O'Reilly, Mark A Hanson, Mary L Rosser, Virna P Medina, Chandni Maria Jacob, Hema Divakar, Moshe Hod, Liona C Poon and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diabetes and women's health.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Using FIGO Nutrition Checklist counselling in pregnancy: A review to support healthcare professionals.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 14 countries.

Sarah Louise KilleenUCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Niamh DonnellanUCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Sharleen L O'ReillyUCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark A HansonInstitute of Developmental Sciences, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mary L RosserDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Virna P MedinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health, Universidad del Valle, Clínica Imbanaco Quirón Salud, Universidad Libre, Cali, Colombia.
Chandni Maria JacobInstitute of Developmental Sciences, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Hema DivakarDivakar's Specialty Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Moshe HodHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Liona C PoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lina BergmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Patrick O'BrienInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Anil KapurWorld Diabetes Foundation, Bagsvaerd, Denmark.
Bo JacobssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cynthia V MaxwellMaternal Fetal Medicine, Sinai Health and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Harold David McIntyreMater Health, University of Queensland, Mater Health Campus, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Lesley ReganImperial College London, London, UK.
Esraa AlgurjiaThe World Association of Trainees in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Paris, France.
Ronald C MaDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sumaiya AdamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Fionnuala M McAuliffeUCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
FIGO Committee on Impact of Pregnancy on Long-term Health and the FIGO Division of Maternal and Newborn Health
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNNational Maternity Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEBaghdad Medical City · IQColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USImperial College London · GBLondon Women's Clinic · GBMater Health Services · AUMediHope Super Specialty Hospital · INNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOTel Aviv University · ILUniversidad del Valle · COUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of Toronto · CAWorld Diabetes Foundation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The period before and during pregnancy is increasingly recognized as an important stage for addressing malnutrition. This can help to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases in mothers and passage of risk to their infants. The FIGO Nutrition Checklist is a tool designed to address these issues. The checklist contains questions on specific dietary requirements, body mass index, diet quality, and micronutrients. Through answering these questions, awareness is generated, potential risks are identified, and information is collected that can inform health-promoting conversations between women and their healthcare professionals. The tool can be used across a range of health settings, regions, and life stages. The aim of this review is to summarize nutritional recommendations related to the FIGO Nutrition Checklist to support healthcare providers using it in practice. Included is a selection of global dietary recommendations for each of the components of the checklist and practical insights from countries that have used it. Implementation of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist will help identify potential nutritional deficiencies in women so that they can be addressed by healthcare providers. This has potential longstanding benefits for mothers and their children, across generations.

Indexed as

ChecklistDietChildCounselingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfantPregnancyassessmentcounsellingdietFIGO Nutrition Checklistnutritionpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36635083
PMCPMC10108324
OpenAlexW4315927962

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.