Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36635344›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023

Transcriptional and mutational signatures of the Drosophila ageing germline.

Evan Witt, Christopher B Langer, Nicolas Svetec, Li Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. De Novo Genes.Annual review of genetics · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan WittLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher B LangerLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4119-2606
Nicolas SvetecLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-2752
Li ZhaoLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. lzhao@rockefeller.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-1996
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

The genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of phenotypic innovationhttps://apps.era.nih.gov/gm/reportCheckList.do?applicationID=9798249R35GM133780 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI Li Zhao · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing is a complex biological process that is accompanied by changes in gene expression and mutational load. In many species, including humans, older fathers pass on more paternally derived de novo mutations; however, the cellular basis and cell types driving this pattern are still unclear. To explore the root causes of this phenomenon, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on testes from young and old male Drosophila and genomic sequencing (DNA sequencing) on somatic tissues from the same flies. We found that early germ cells from old and young flies enter spermatogenesis with similar mutational loads but older flies are less able to remove mutations during spermatogenesis. Mutations in old cells may also increase during spermatogenesis. Our data reveal that old and young flies have distinct mutational biases. Many classes of genes show increased postmeiotic expression in the germlines of older flies. Late spermatogenesis-biased genes have higher dN/dS (ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions) than early spermatogenesis-biased genes, supporting the hypothesis that late spermatogenesis is a source of evolutionary innovation. Surprisingly, genes biased in young germ cells show higher dN/dS than genes biased in old germ cells. Our results provide new insights into the role of the germline in de novo mutation.

Indexed as

DrosophilaTestisAgingAnimalsGerm CellsHumansMaleMutation

Identifiers

PMID36635344
PMCPMC10291629
OpenAlexW4315784552

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.