ArticleJIMD reports2023
Quantifying the impact of symptomatic acute hepatic porphyria on well-being via patient-reported outcomes: Results from the Porphyria Worldwide Patient Experience Research (POWER) study.
Article in JIMD reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of givosiran in Japanese patients with acute hepatic porphyria: clinical findings from an expanded access study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Long-term follow-up of givosiran treatment in patients with acute intermittent porphyria from a phase 1/2, 48-month open-label extension study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Trial
- Patient-centered and coordinated therapy with RNA interference-based givosiran for acute hepatic porphyria: real-life experience for an ultra-rare disease from Romania.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- New pharmacotherapies for the erythropoietic protoporphyrias: an analysis of trial protocols from a patient perspective.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Patient experience with acute hepatic porphyria before and after long-term givosiran treatment in a qualitative interview study.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025Article
- Givosiran: a targeted treatment for acute intermittent porphyria.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024Review
- Assessing Chitinases and Neurofilament Light Chain as Biomarkers for Adult-Onset Leukodystrophies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for acute hepatic porphyrias.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Clinical features of acute attacks, chronic symptoms, and long-term complications among patients with acute hepatic porphyria in Japan: a real-world claims database study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- CORRIGENDUM.JIMD reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCORRIGENDUM.2023
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) is a group of rare genetic diseases of heme biosynthesis resulting in severe neurovisceral attacks and chronic complications that negatively impact patients' well-being. This study evaluated the impacts of AHP on patients' physical and emotional health from a global perspective. Adult patients from the United States, Italy, Spain, Australia, Mexico, and Brazil with AHP with >1 porphyria attack within the past 2 years or receiving intravenous hemin and/or glucose for attack prevention completed an online survey assessing demographics, health characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes. Results were analyzed collectively and by patient subgroups. Ninety-two patients with AHP across the six countries completed the survey. More than 70% of patients reported that their physical, emotional, and financial health was fair or poor. Among patients who reported pain, fatigue, and muscle weakness, 94.3%, 95.6%, and 91.4%, respectively, reported that these symptoms limited daily activities. Moderate to severe depression was present in 58.7% of patients, and moderate to severe anxiety in 48.9% of patients. Of the 47% of patients who were employed, 36.8% reported loss in productivity while at work. Among patients, 85.9% reported that they had to change or modify goals that were important to them because of AHP. Aside from differences in healthcare utilization and pain severity, scores did not significantly vary with attack rate or use of hemin or glucose prophylactic treatments. AHP substantially impacts patients' physical and emotional well-being, regardless of hemin or glucose prophylactic treatment or frequency of attacks. This multinational study demonstrates that there is substantial disease burden for patients with AHP, even among those experiencing sporadic attacks or using prophylactic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.