Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2023

Association between maternal e-cigarette use during pregnancy and low gestational weight gain.

Xiaozhong Wen, Marjorie A Thomas, Lufeiya Liu, Aye A Moe, Peter H Duong, Malkijah E Griffiths, Ambra L Munlyn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaozhong WenDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7721-8353
Marjorie A ThomasDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Lufeiya LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Aye A MoeDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Peter H DuongDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Malkijah E GriffithsDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Ambra L MunlynDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Determinants and health effects of dynamic changes in e-cigarette use before, during, and after pregnancyR21DA053638 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI WEN, XIAOZHONG · 2022 to 2023
$470k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA053638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the risk of low gestational weight gain (GWG) in women who use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), combustible cigarettes, or both e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes (dual use) during pregnancy.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the data from 176 882 singleton pregnancies in the 2016-2020 US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Postpartum women self-reported their use of e-cigarettes and/or cigarettes during the last 3 months of pregnancy. Low GWG was defined as the total GWG less than 12.7 kg, less than 11.3 kg, less than 6.8 kg, and less than 5.0 kg (<28, <25, <15, and < 11 lb) for women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity, respectively. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of low GWG, adjusting for confounders.

resultsIn this national sample, 921 (weighted percentage, 0.5%) of women were e-cigarette users and 1308 (0.7%) were dual users during late pregnancy. Compared with non-users during late pregnancy (40 090, 22.1%), cigarette users (4499, 28.0%) and dual users (427, 26.0%) had a higher risk of low GWG, but e-cigarette users had a similar risk (237, 22.1%). Adjustment for sociodemographic and pregnancy confounders moderately attenuated these associations: confounder-adjusted ORs 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.35) for cigarette users, 1.18 (95% CI 0.96-1.44) for dual users, and 0.99 (95% CI 0.78-1.27) for e-cigarette users.

conclusionsUnlike combustible cigarette use, e-cigarette use during late pregnancy does not appear to be a risk factor for low GWG.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsGestational Weight GainVapingBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansObesityOverweightPregnancybody mass indexcigarettesE-cigaretteselectronic cigarettesENDSgestational weight gainpregnancypregnancy risk assessment monitoring systemsmokingtobacco

Identifiers

PMID36637259
PMCPMC10523399
OpenAlexW4315928027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.