Trial reportESC heart failure2023
Danish phase II trial using adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stromal cells for patients with ischaemic heart failure.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiomyocyte regeneration therapy and its effect on LVEF and scar size- a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac function indices in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell versus bone-marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Dose-response relationship of MSCs as living Bio-drugs in HFrEF patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Results from the SCIENCE and Danish ASC trials using allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells to treat ischemic heart failure patients.Regenerative medicine · 2025Trial
- Mesenchymal stromal cells to treat patients with non-ischaemic heart failure: Results from SCIENCE II pilot study.ESC heart failure · 2024Trial
- Danish phase II trial using adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stromal cells for patients with ischaemic heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Trial
- Review
- Materiobiology-guided regulation of mesenchymal stromal cell fate for aging-related diseases: From basic parameter design to clinical application.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- From Adipose Tissue to Cardiac Repair: Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiovascular Regeneration.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in nonischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - ARIISE study design.Future cardiology · 2026Article
- Designs of the clinical trials aiming at evaluating cell and gene therapy products: A critical appraisal from a literature review.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Review
- In vitro assays for investigating the immunomodulatory properties of human mesenchymal stromal cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of clinical trials and Progress in stem cell therapies for advanced heart failure.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- Current status and new horizons in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular regenerative medicine (CaVaReM): an update.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPatients suffering from chronic ischaemic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) have reduced quality-of-life, repetitive hospital admissions, and reduced life expectancy. Allogeneic cell therapy is currently investigated as a potential treatment option after initially encouraging results from clinical autologous and allogeneic trials in patients with HFrEF. We aimed to investigate the allogeneic Cardiology Stem Cell Centre Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal Stromal Cell product (CSCC_ASC) as an add-on therapy in patients with chronic HFrEF. METHODS AND
resultsThis is a Danish multi-centre double-blinded placebo-controlled phase II study with direct intra-myocardial injections of allogeneic CSCC_ASC. A total of 81 HFrEF patients were included and randomized 2:1 to CSCC_ASC or placebo injections. The inclusion criteria were reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 45%), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III despite optimal anti-congestive heart failure medication and no further revascularization options. Injections of 0.3 mL CSCC_ASC (total cell dose 100 × 10
resultsMean age was 67.0 ± 9.0 years and 66.6 ± 8.1 years in the ASC and placebo groups, respectively. LVESV was unchanged from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the ASC (125.7 ± 68.8 mL and 126.3 ± 72.5 mL, P = 0.827) and placebo (134.6 ± 45.8 mL and 135.3 ± 49.6 mL, P = 0.855) group without any differences between the groups (0.0 mL (95% CI -9.1 to 9.0 mL, P = 0.992). Neither were there significant changes in left ventricular end diastolic volume or LVEF within the two groups or between groups -5.7 mL (95% CI -16.7 to 5.3 mL, P = 0.306) and -1.7% (95% CI -4.4. to 1.0, P = 0.212), respectively). NYHA classification and 6-min walk test did not alter significantly in the two groups (P > 0.05). The quality-of-life, total symptom, and overall summary score improved significantly only in the ASC group but not between groups. There were 24 serious adverse events (SAEs) in the ASC group and 11 SAEs in the placebo group without any significant differences between the two groups at 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier plot using log-rank test of combined cardiac events showed an overall mean time to event of 30 ± 2 months in the ASC group and 29 ± 2 months in the placebo group without any differences between the groups during the 3 years follow-up period (P = 0.994).
conclusionsIntramyocardial CSCC_ASC injections in patients with chronic HFrEF were safe but did not improve myocardial function or structure, nor clinical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.