Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639728›Full record

ReviewNature communications2023

Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing.

Jianli Tao, Daniel E Bauer, Roberto Chiarle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. In vivo systematic detection of the outcomes of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DNA repair in skeletal muscle stem cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Role of NMedComm · 2026
    Review
  14. Clinical translation of epigenome editing technologies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficient and Safe Knockout ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Repurposing Tumor Cells: A Paradigm Shift in Cell-Based Therapies for Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianli TaoDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jianli.tao@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-1489
Daniel E BauerDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Broad Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Roberto ChiarleDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. roberto.chiarle@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1564-8531

Funding

APOBEC proteins as drivers of chromosomal translocations in solid cancersR01CA222598 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHIARLE, ROBERTO · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas gene editing has revolutionized experimental molecular biology over the past decade and holds great promise for the treatment of human genetic diseases. Here we review the development of CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12/Cas13 nucleases, DNA base editors, prime editors, and RNA base editors, focusing on the assessment and improvement of their editing precision and safety, pushing the limit of editing specificity and efficiency. We summarize the capabilities and limitations of each CRISPR tool from DNA editing to RNA editing, and highlight the opportunities for future improvements and applications in basic research, as well as the therapeutic and clinical considerations for their use in patients.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA EditingDNAEndonucleasesGene EditingHumansDNAEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID36639728
PMCPMC9838544

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.