Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643471›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Network Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Sectors in the p53 Protein.

Jonathan D Fabry, Kelly M Thayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan D FabryDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut06457United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3110-4630
Kelly M ThayerDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut06457United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7437-9517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Design of allosteric regulators is an emergent field in the area of drug discovery holding promise for currently untreated diseases. Allosteric regulators bind to a protein in one location and affect a distant site. The ubiquitous presence of allosteric effectors in biology and the success of serendipitously identified allosteric compounds point to the potential they hold. Although the mechanism of transmission of an allosteric signal is not unequivocally determined, one hypothesis suggests that groups of evolutionarily covarying residues within a protein, termed sectors, are conduits. A long-term goal of our lab is to allosterically modulate the activity of proteins by binding small molecules at points of allosteric control. However, methods to consistently identify such points remain unclear. Sector residues on the surfaces of proteins are a promising source of allosteric targets. Recently, we introduced molecular dynamics (MD)-based sectors; MD sectors capitalize on covariance of motion, in place of evolutionary covariance. By focusing on motional covariance, MD sectors tap into the framework of statistical mechanics afforded by the Boltzmann ensemble of structural conformations comprising the underlying data set. We hypothesized that the method of MD sectors can be used to identify a cohesive network of motionally covarying residues capable of transmitting an allosteric signal in a protein. While our initial qualitative results showed promise for the method to predict sectors, that a network of cohesively covarying residues had been produced remained an untested assumption. In this work, we apply network theory to rigorously analyze MD sectors, allowing us to quantitatively assess the biologically relevant property of network cohesiveness of sectors in the context of the tumor suppressor protein, p53. We revised the methodology for assessing and improving MD sectors. Specifically, we introduce a metric to calculate the cohesive properties of the network. Our new approach separates residues into two categories: sector residues and non-sector residues. The relatedness within each respective group is computed with a distance metric. Cohesive sector networks are identified as those that have high relatedness among the sector residues which exceeds the relatedness of the residues to the non-sector residues in terms of the correlation of motions. Our major finding was that the revised means of obtaining sectors was more efficacious than previous iterations, as evidenced by the greater cohesion of the networks. These results are discussed in the context of the development of allosteric regulators of p53 in particular and the expected applicability of the method to the drug design field in general.

Identifiers

PMID36643471
PMCPMC9835189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.