Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650299›Full record

SynthesisJournal of digital imaging2023

Use of Deep Neural Networks in the Detection and Automated Classification of Lesions Using Clinical Images in Ophthalmology, Dermatology, and Oral Medicine-A Systematic Review.

Rita Fabiane Teixeira Gomes, Lauren Frenzel Schuch, Manoela Domingues Martins, Emerson Ferreira Honório, Rodrigo Marques de Figueiredo, Jean Schmith, Giovanna Nunes Machado, Vinicius Coelho Carrard

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Elementary Oral Lesions from Clinical Images.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rita Fabiane Teixeira GomesGraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Barcelos 2492/503, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-003, Brazil. ritafabgomes@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0001-6196-1217
Lauren Frenzel SchuchDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0993-936X
Manoela Domingues MartinsGraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Barcelos 2492/503, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8662-5965
Emerson Ferreira HonórioGraduate Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Luterana Do Brasil, Canoas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8452-413X
Rodrigo Marques de FigueiredoTechnology in Automation and Electronics Laboratory - TECAE Lab, University of Vale Do Rio Dos Sinos - UNISINOS, São Leopoldo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3496-5575
Jean SchmithTechnology in Automation and Electronics Laboratory - TECAE Lab, University of Vale Do Rio Dos Sinos - UNISINOS, São Leopoldo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7642-3235
Giovanna Nunes MachadoTechnology in Automation and Electronics Laboratory - TECAE Lab, University of Vale Do Rio Dos Sinos - UNISINOS, São Leopoldo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4676-7181
Vinicius Coelho CarrardGraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Barcelos 2492/503, Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1624-0178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANN) are artificial intelligence (AI) techniques used in the automated recognition and classification of pathological changes from clinical images in areas such as ophthalmology, dermatology, and oral medicine. The combination of enterprise imaging and AI is gaining notoriety for its potential benefits in healthcare areas such as cardiology, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, physiatry, radiation oncology, radiology, and endoscopic. The present study aimed to analyze, through a systematic literature review, the application of performance of ANN and deep learning in the recognition and automated classification of lesions from clinical images, when comparing to the human performance. The PRISMA 2020 approach (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) was used by searching four databases of studies that reference the use of IA to define the diagnosis of lesions in ophthalmology, dermatology, and oral medicine areas. A quantitative and qualitative analyses of the articles that met the inclusion criteria were performed. The search yielded the inclusion of 60 studies. It was found that the interest in the topic has increased, especially in the last 3 years. We observed that the performance of IA models is promising, with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, most of them had outcomes equivalent to human comparators. The reproducibility of the performance of models in real-life practice has been reported as a critical point. Study designs and results have been progressively improved. IA resources have the potential to contribute to several areas of health. In the coming years, it is likely to be incorporated into everyday life, contributing to the precision and reducing the time required by the diagnostic process.

Indexed as

DermatologyOphthalmologyArtificial IntelligenceHumansNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceAutomated classificationComputer-assistedConvolutional neural networkDiagnosisPhotography

Identifiers

PMID36650299
PMCPMC10287602

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.