Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650354›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Endoscopic and histopathological assessment of individuals undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass: a 2-year follow-up.

João Gabriel Romero Braga, Guilherme Hoverter Callejas, Luigi Carlo da Silva Costa, Ciro Garcia Montes, Felipe David Mendonça Chaim, Martinho Antonio Gestic, Murillo Pimentel Utrini, Francisco Callejas-Neto, Almino Cardoso Ramos, Elinton Adami Chaim and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

João Gabriel Romero BragaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Guilherme Hoverter CallejasDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Luigi Carlo da Silva CostaUnit of Digestive Endoscopy, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Ciro Garcia MontesUnit of Digestive Endoscopy, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Felipe David Mendonça ChaimDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Martinho Antonio GesticDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Murillo Pimentel UtriniDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Francisco Callejas-NetoDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Almino Cardoso RamosDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Elinton Adami ChaimDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Everton CazzoDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil. notrevezzo@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-5804-1580
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is much debate over the occurrence of biliary reflux to the gastric pouch after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and its potential risks.

objectiveTo assess endoscopic and histopathological findings following a standardized protocol of biopsy collection two years after OAGB.

methodsA historical cohort study was conducted, based on a prospectively collected database, which involved 39 participants who underwent OAGB. Participants underwent clinical evaluation and esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the time of surgery and 24 months afterward. Post-operatively, biopsy specimens in esophagogastric junction, pouch, and anastomosis were systematically collected.

results92.3% of the participants were female and the mean age was 37 ± 8.5 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) significantly decreased from 37.6 ± 5.7 kg/m

conclusionsUsing a standardized protocol of post-operative biopsy collection, low rates of severe endoscopic and histopathological abnormalities were observed two years after OAGB. Nevertheless, as most patients have histologically proven inflammation, bile in the gastric pouch, and endoscopic gastritis, long-term surveillance is essential because of the uncertain risk of these abnormalities.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastritisLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidStomach UlcerAdultCohort StudiesEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInflammationMaleMetaplasiaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBariatric surgeryBile refluxEndoscopyGastric bypassObesity

Identifiers

PMID36650354
OpenAlexW4316878006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.