Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650557›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Association of red blood cells and plasma transfusion versus red blood cell transfusion only with survival for treatment of major traumatic hemorrhage in prehospital setting in England: a multicenter study.

Harriet Tucker, Karim Brohi, Joachim Tan, Christopher Aylwin, Roger Bloomer, Rebecca Cardigan, Ross Davenport, Edward D Davies, Phillip Godfrey, Rachel Hawes and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehospital plasma transfusion versus standard of care following traumatic injury: a review of the systematic reviews and a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pre-hospital assessment of trauma associated severe hemorrhage (phTASH) - analysis of TraumaRegister DGUScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Harriet TuckerCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Karim BrohiCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Joachim TanSt George's University of London, London, UK.
Christopher AylwinSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Roger BloomerKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rebecca CardiganNHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK.
Ross DavenportCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Edward D DaviesRoyal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.
Phillip GodfreyJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Rachel HawesNewcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Richard LyonAir Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Kent, UK.
Josephine McCullaghBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Simon StanworthNHS Blood and Transplant, Cambridge, UK.
Julian ThompsonSouthmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
James UprichardSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Simon WalshSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anne WeaverBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Laura GreenCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK. laura.green@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Preston Hospital · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn-hospital acute resuscitation in trauma has evolved toward early and balanced transfusion resuscitation with red blood cells (RBC) and plasma being transfused in equal ratios. Being able to deliver this ratio in prehospital environments is a challenge. A combined component, like leukocyte-depleted red cell and plasma (RCP), could facilitate early prehospital resuscitation with RBC and plasma, while at the same time improving logistics for the team. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical benefits of RCP.

objectiveTo compare prehospital transfusion of combined RCP versus RBC alone or RBC and plasma separately (RBC + P) on mortality in trauma bleeding patients.

methodsData were collected prospectively on patients who received prehospital transfusion (RBC + thawed plasma/Lyoplas or RCP) for traumatic hemorrhage from six prehospital services in England (2018-2020). Retrospective data on patients who transfused RBC from 2015 to 2018 were included for comparison. The association between transfusion arms and 24-h and 30-day mortality, adjusting for age, injury mechanism, age, prehospital heart rate and blood pressure, was evaluated using generalized estimating equations.

resultsOut of 970 recruited patients, 909 fulfilled the study criteria (RBC + P = 391, RCP = 295, RBC = 223). RBC + P patients were older (mean age 42 vs 35 years for RCP and RBC), and 80% had a blunt injury (RCP = 52%, RBC = 56%). RCP and RBC + P were associated with lower odds of death at 24-h, compared to RBC alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.69 [95%CI: 0.52; 0.92] and 0.60 [95%CI: 0.32; 1.13], respectively). The lower odds of death for RBC + P and RCP vs RBC were driven by penetrating injury (aOR 0.22 [95%CI: 0.10; 0.53] and 0.39 [95%CI: 0.20; 0.76], respectively). There was no association between RCP or RBC + P with 30-day survival vs RBC.

conclusionPrehospital plasma transfusion for penetrating injury was associated with lower odds of death at 24-h compared to RBC alone. Large trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesWounds and InjuriesAdultBlood Component TransfusionEnglandErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionHemorrhageHumansPlasmaResuscitationRetrospective StudiesCombined red cell and plasmaMortalityPrehospital transfusionTrauma

Identifiers

PMID36650557
PMCPMC9847037
OpenAlexW4317039677

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.