Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36651276›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Annotation of uORFs in the OMIM genes allows to reveal pathogenic variants in 5'UTRs.

Alexandra Filatova, Ivan Reveguk, Maria Piatkova, Daria Bessonova, Olga Kuziakova, Victoria Demakova, Alexander Romanishin, Veniamin Fishman, Yerzhan Imanmalik, Nikolay Chekanov and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional analysis ofMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra FilatovaResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5979-0727
Ivan RevegukLaboratoire de Biologie Structurale de la Cellule, École Polytechnique, Paris, France.
Maria PiatkovaInstitute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia.
Daria BessonovaMedical Center, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Olga KuziakovaInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Victoria DemakovaMedical Center, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Alexander RomanishinInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Veniamin FishmanArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-3100
Yerzhan ImanmalikArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Nikolay ChekanovArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Rostislav SkitchenkoComputer Technologies Laboratory, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-8206
Yury BarbitoffBioinformatics Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3222-440X
Olga KardymonArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail SkoblovResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-3438
Far Eastern Federal University · RUResearch Centre for Medical Genetics · RUÉcole Polytechnique · FRImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal University · RUInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RUITMO University · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of studies emphasize the role of non-coding variants in the development of hereditary diseases. However, the interpretation of such variants in clinical genetic testing still remains a critical challenge due to poor knowledge of their pathogenicity mechanisms. It was previously shown that variants in 5'-untranslated regions (5'UTRs) can lead to hereditary diseases due to disruption of upstream open reading frames (uORFs). Here, we performed a manual annotation of upstream translation initiation sites (TISs) in human disease-associated genes from the OMIM database and revealed ∼4.7 thousand of TISs related to uORFs. We compared our TISs with the previous studies and provided a list of 'high confidence' uORFs. Using a luciferase assay, we experimentally validated the translation of uORFs in the ETFDH, PAX9, MAST1, HTT, TTN,GLI2 and COL2A1 genes, as well as existence of N-terminal CDS extension in the ZIC2 gene. Besides, we created a tool to annotate the effects of genetic variants located in uORFs. We revealed the variants from the HGMD and ClinVar databases that disrupt uORFs and thereby could lead to Mendelian disorders. We also showed that the distribution of uORFs-affecting variants differs between pathogenic and population variants. Finally, drawing on manually curated data, we developed a machine-learning algorithm that allows us to predict the TISs in other human genes.

Indexed as

5' Untranslated RegionsDatabases, GeneticDiseaseOpen Reading FramesHumansProtein Biosynthesis5' Untranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID36651276
PMCPMC9943669
OpenAlexW4317209313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.