ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2023
Central role for BRAF in cardiac hypertrophy: rethinking the pathological-physiological divide.
Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The RAF/MEK/ERK1/2 signaling cascade has been implicated in pathological cardiac hypertrophy downstream of some Gq-coupled receptors. The RAF family of kinases consists of three isoforms (ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF) and until recently most studies on this signaling pathway in the heart have focused on RAF1 (CRAF). In a recent issue of Clinical Science, Alharbi et al. utilized an inducible cardiac myocyte targeted knockout mouse model to define the role of BRAF in pathological versus physiological hypertrophy using angiotensin II and phenylephrine (PE) infusion, respectively. They reported that loss of BRAF attenuated both pathological cardiac hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis. BRAF knockout decreased cardiac function with PE in male mice and enhanced both interstitial and perivascular cardiac fibrosis but had no effect on hypertrophy. In contrast, loss of BRAF attenuated physiological hypertrophy in female mice but had no effect on fibrosis or contractility. These observations extend those previously made by this group assessing the consequences of expressing an inducible activating mutant of BRAF in the heart and the benefit of enhancing RAF/MEK/ERK1/2 signaling by exploiting the 'RAF paradox'. Additional studies are needed to better define the role of BRAF under conditions reflective of chronic stress on the heart due to the biomechanical stimulation exerted by hypertension. In addition, the role of BRAF and its activation in overt heart failure remains to be established. Nevertheless, the new findings highlight the potential importance of additional signaling events, perhaps related to RAF1 or ERK1/2 activation, in shaping BRAF signaling in a sex- and context-dependent manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.