Evidence mapPaperPMID 36656582Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.

Crystal W Cené, Meera Viswanathan, Caroline M Fichtenberg, Nila A Sathe, Sara M Kennedy, Laura M Gottlieb, Yuri Cartier, Monica E Peek

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health disparities in neurology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. National analysis of health-related social needs among adult injury survivors.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Crystal W CenéDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego.
Meera ViswanathanRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park.
Caroline M FichtenbergUniversity of California, San Francisco Social Intervention Research and Evaluation Network, San Francisco.
Nila A SatheRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park.
Sara M KennedyRTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park.
Laura M GottliebSchool of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco.
Yuri CartierUniversity of California, San Francisco Social Intervention Research and Evaluation Network, San Francisco.
Monica E PeekSection of General Internal Medicine, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of San Francisco · USRTI International · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · 2025 to 2025
$660k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Social needs interventions aim to improve health outcomes and mitigate inequities by addressing health-related social needs, such as lack of transportation or food insecurity. However, it is not clear whether these studies are reducing racial or ethnic inequities. Objective: To understand how studies of interventions addressing social needs among multiracial or multiethnic populations conceptualize and analyze differential intervention outcomes by race or ethnicity. Evidence Review: Sources included a scoping review of systematic searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1995, through November 29, 2021, expert suggestions, and hand searches of key citations. Eligible studies evaluated interventions addressing social needs; reported behavioral, health, or utilization outcomes or harms; and were conducted in multiracial or multiethnic populations. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full text for inclusion. The team developed a framework to assess whether the study was "conceptually thoughtful" for understanding root causes of racial health inequities (ie, noted that race or ethnicity are markers of exposure to racism) and whether analyses were "analytically informative" for advancing racial health equity research (ie, examined differential intervention impacts by race or ethnicity). Findings: Of 152 studies conducted in multiracial or multiethnic populations, 44 studies included race or ethnicity in their analyses; of these, only 4 (9%) were conceptually thoughtful. Twenty-one studies (14%) were analytically informative. Seven of 21 analytically informative studies reported differences in outcomes by race or ethnicity, whereas 14 found no differences. Among the 7 that found differential outcomes, 4 found the interventions were associated with improved outcomes for minoritized racial or ethnic populations or reduced inequities between minoritized and White populations. No studies were powered to detect differences. Conclusions and Relevance: In this review of a scoping review, studies of social needs interventions in multiracial or multiethnic populations were rarely conceptually thoughtful for understanding root causes of racial health inequities and infrequently conducted informative analyses on intervention effectiveness by race or ethnicity. Future work should use a theoretically sound conceptualization of how race (as a proxy for racism) affects social drivers of health and use this understanding to ensure social needs interventions benefit minoritized racial and ethnic groups facing social and structural barriers to health.

Indexed as

Health EquityRacismEthnicityHealth InequitiesHumansRacial Groups

Identifiers

PMID36656582
PMCPMC9857687
OpenAlexW4317434699

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.