Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36658340›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2023

Engineered live bacteria suppress Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in mouse lung and dissolve endotracheal-tube biofilms.

Rocco Mazzolini, Irene Rodríguez-Arce, Laia Fernández-Barat, Carlos Piñero-Lambea, Victoria Garrido, Agustín Rebollada-Merino, Anna Motos, Antoni Torres, Maria Jesús Grilló, Luis Serrano and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Living Microbial Drugs.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Toward development of soil-derivedBiodesign research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rocco Mazzolini *Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Irene Rodríguez-Arce *Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Laia Fernández-BaratCellex Laboratory, CibeRes, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-9636
Carlos Piñero-LambeaCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-3702
Victoria GarridoCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-7188
Agustín Rebollada-MerinoVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-2713
Anna MotosCellex Laboratory, CibeRes, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni TorresCellex Laboratory, CibeRes, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-2167
Maria Jesús GrillóInstitute of Agrobiotechnology, CSIC-Navarra Government, Navarra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1819-0186
Luis SerranoCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain. luis.serrano@crg.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-1392
Maria Lluch-SenarCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain. maria.lluch@pulmobio.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-4353
Centre for Genomic Regulation · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESAgrobiotechnology Institute · ESAve Maria University · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered live bacteria could provide a new modality for treating lung infections, a major cause of mortality worldwide. In the present study, we engineered a genome-reduced human lung bacterium, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, to treat ventilator-associated pneumonia, a disease with high hospital mortality when associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. After validating the biosafety of an attenuated M. pneumoniae chassis in mice, we introduced four transgenes into the chromosome by transposition to implement bactericidal and biofilm degradation activities. We show that this engineered strain has high efficacy against an acute P. aeruginosa lung infection in a mouse model. In addition, we demonstrated that the engineered strain could dissolve biofilms formed in endotracheal tubes of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and be combined with antibiotics targeting the peptidoglycan layer to increase efficacy against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. We expect our M. pneumoniae-engineered strain to be able to treat biofilm-associated infections in the respiratory tract.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPseudomonas InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLungMiceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID36658340
PMCPMC10421741
OpenAlexW4317498968

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.