Evidence mapPaperPMID 36658688Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2023

An audit of hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in India: Story of a decade.

Deeksha Pandey, Shripad Hebbar, Pranadeep Reddy Inukollu, Viwal Venisa Lobo, Suvrati Bansal, Divya Solipuram, Nagashree Suhas, Sarah Arsalan Habibullah, Rishi Jitesh Popat, Akshita Agrawal and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deeksha PandeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Shripad HebbarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Pranadeep Reddy InukolluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TRR Medical College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Viwal Venisa LoboDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Suvrati BansalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Divya SolipuramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TRR Medical College, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Nagashree SuhasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Sarah Arsalan HabibullahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Rishi Jitesh PopatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Akshita AgrawalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Karnataka, India.
Sayyad MgDepartment of Statistics, Abeda Inamdar Senior College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe appropriateness of hysterectomy has gained an interest in scrutiny and debate. Periodic audits of the prevailing clinical practices are imperative for insight, and to formulate recommendations and guidelines. We report the temporal trends of hysterectomies, over the last 10 years in a teaching hospital.

methodsPresent study involved all patients who underwent hysterectomy at a teaching hospital, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2021. Patients were identified by medical record tracking using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes. Case records were reviewed for demography, indication for surgery, approach, complications, hospital stay, and histopathological correlation.

resultsOver the years the absolute number of hysterectomies in our hospital has ranged from 414 to 597 (mean 476), barring the coronavirus 19 pandemic year. The proportion of hysterectomy among all gynaecological admissions has ranged from 6% to 9%, except in 2020 where this proportion dropped down to 4%. The indications, age distribution, surgical approach, and complications have remained almost same.

conclusionWe report a static trend in hysterectomy over the past 10 years. This audit provides an insight for the need of shifting the abdominal to vaginal route, in carefully chosen patients. This will be beneficial for the patients, and for the trainees, where they can learn under supervision. Availability and patient education about the nonsurgical management options for benign gynecological conditions, as well as awareness about sequelae of hysterectomy, will bring down the rate in countries such as India.

Indexed as

Genital Diseases, FemaleLaparoscopyAbdomenFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansHysterectomyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36658688
PMCPMC12755541

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.