SynthesisCurrent cardiology reviews2023
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.
Synthesis in Current cardiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06715137 (Microvascular Dysfunction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease and the Effect of Exercise Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Microvascular Dysfunction in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease and the Effect of Exercise Training
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forensic pathological analysis of sudden cardiac death in 10 cases with congenital coronary ostial stenosis: a technical report.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and Predictors of Impaired Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Adolescents After Arterial Switch Operation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pathological mechanisms and clinical research progress of endothelial dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in childhood: An emerging pathological entity and its clinical implications.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Peripheral Microvascular Dysfunction in Children and Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: A Literature Review.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart diseases represent a wide range of cardiac malformations. Medical and surgical advances have dramatically increased the survival of patients with congenital heart disease, leading to a continuously growing number of children, adolescents, and adults with congenital heart disease. Nevertheless, congenital heart disease patients have a worse prognosis compared to healthy individuals of similar age. There is substantial overlap in the pathophysiology of congenital heart disease and heart failure induced by other etiologies. Among the pathophysiological changes in heart failure, coronary microvascular dysfunction has recently emerged as a crucial modulator of disease initiation and progression. Similarly, coronary microvascular dysfunction could be important in the pathophysiology of congenital heart diseases as well. For this systematic review, studies on maximal vasodilatory capacity in the coronary microvascular bed in patients with congenital heart disease were searched using the PubMed database. To date, coronary microvascular dysfunction in congenital heart disease patients is incompletely understood because studies on this topic are rare and heterogeneous. The prevalence, extent, and pathophysiological relevance of coronary microvascular dysfunction in congenital heart diseases remain to be elucidated. Herein, we discuss what is currently known about coronary microvascular dysfunction in congenital heart disease and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.