ArticleScientific reports2023
Pilot study of optical coherence tomography angiography-derived microvascular metrics in hands and feet of healthy and diabetic people.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal Assessment of Vascularity in Actinic Keratosis Using Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography: Practical Considerations and Theoretical Insights.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling of chronic foot ulcer outcomes using longitudinal photoacoustic imaging.Npj imaging · 2026Article
- Impact of image preprocessing on dermatological OCTA vessel segmentation: a DERMA-OCTA study.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Ring-segment piezopolymer sensor optimized for cylindrical-wave detection in optical-resolution optoacoustic angiography with extended imaging depth.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- O2C-Based Evaluation of Microperfusion During Dialysis Fistula Creation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Detecting metastatic potential of cancer through longitudinal vasculature imaging of biomaterial scaffold using non-invasiveTheranostics · 2025Article
- Vascular Characteristics of Treatment-resistant and -responsive Actinic Keratosis Identified with Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- Towards standardising retinal OCT angiography image analysis with open-source toolbox OCTAVA.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Longitudinal Monitoring of Angiogenesis in a Murine Window Chamber ModelTissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Monitoring of Cutaneous Wound Healing in Non-Diabetic and Diabetic Model of Adult Zebrafish Using OCT Angiography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Innovative Macula Capillaries Plexuses Visualization with OCTA B-Scan Graph Representation: Transforming OCTA B-Scan into OCTA Graph Representation.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive, high-resolution imaging modality with growing application in dermatology and microvascular assessment. Accepted reference values for OCTA-derived microvascular parameters in skin do not yet exist but need to be established to drive OCTA into the clinic. In this pilot study, we assess a range of OCTA microvascular metrics at rest and after post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH) in the hands and feet of 52 healthy people and 11 people with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We calculate each metric, measure test-retest repeatability, and evaluate correlation with demographic risk factors. Our study delivers extremity-specific, age-dependent reference values and coefficients of repeatability of nine microvascular metrics at baseline and at the maximum of PORH. Significant differences are not seen for age-dependent microvascular metrics in hand, but they are present for several metrics in the foot. Significant differences are observed between hand and foot, both at baseline and maximum PORH, for most of the microvascular metrics with generally higher values in the hand. Despite a large variability over a range of individuals, as is expected based on heterogeneous ageing phenotypes of the population, the test-retest repeatability is 3.5% to 18% of the mean value for all metrics, which highlights the opportunities for OCTA-based studies in larger cohorts, for longitudinal monitoring, and for assessing the efficacy of interventions. Additionally, branchpoint density in the hand and foot and changes in vessel diameter in response to PORH stood out as good discriminators between healthy and T2DM groups, which indicates their potential value as biomarkers. This study, building on our previous work, represents a further step towards standardised OCTA in clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.