Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670437›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2023

Differential proteomic profile of lumbar and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.

Nina Rostgaard, Markus Harboe Olsen, Maud Ottenheijm, Lylia Drici, Anja Hviid Simonsen, Peter Plomgaard, Hanne Gredal, Helle Harding Poulsen, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Cytokine markers in intracerebral hemorrhage are linked to ventricular imaging and outcomes.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nina Rostgaard *Department of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus Harboe Olsen *Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maud OttenheijmNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lylia DriciNNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anja Hviid SimonsenDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter PlomgaardDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne GredalDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle Harding PoulsenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Steen Gregers HasselbalchDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanna MacAulayDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. macaulay@sund.ku.dk.
Marianne JuhlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. marianne.juhler@regionh.dk.

Funding

AD Strategic Fund and the Alzheimer's Association #ADSF-21-831376-CAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation #201809-2016862European Research Council #681712European Research Council,European Union #101053962European Union Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research JPND2021-00694European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme No 860197 (MIRIADE)Hjärnfonden #FO2019-0228Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF17OC0024718Novo Nordisk Fonden,Denmark NNF19OC0055001Swedish Research Counsil #2018-02532Swedish State Support for Clinical Research #ALFGBG-71320UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL UKDRI-1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathological cerebral conditions may manifest in altered composition of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Although diagnostic CSF analysis seeks to establish pathological disturbances in the brain proper, CSF is generally sampled from the lumbar compartment for reasons of technical ease and ethical considerations. We here aimed to compare the molecular composition of CSF obtained from the ventricular versus the lumbar CSF compartments to establish a relevance for employing lumbar CSF as a proxy for the CSF bathing the brain tissue.

methodsCSF was collected from 46 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients during their diagnostic workup (lumbar samples) and in connection with their subsequent CSF diversion shunt surgery (ventricular samples). The mass-spectrometry-based proteomic profile was determined in these samples and in addition, selected biomarkers were quantified with ELISA (S100B, neurofilament light (NfL), amyloid-β (Aβ

resultsIn total 1231 proteins were detected in the human CSF. Of these, 216 distributed equally in the two CSF compartments, whereas 22 were preferentially (or solely) present in the ventricular CSF and four in the lumbar CSF. The selected biomarkers of neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's disease displayed differential distribution, some with higher (S100B, T-tau, and P-tau) and some with lower (NfL, Aβ

conclusionsThe overall proteomic profile differs between the ventricular and the lumbar CSF compartments, and so does the distribution of clinically employed biomarkers. However, for a range of CSF proteins and biomarkers, one can reliably employ lumbar CSF as a proxy for ventricular CSF if or a lumbar/cranial index for the particular molecule has been established. It is therefore important to verify the compartmental preference of the proteins or biomarkers of interest prior to extrapolating from lumbar CSF to that of the ventricular fluid bordering the brain.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseProteomicsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBiomarkersBrainHumansPeptide FragmentsSwinetau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsBiomarkersCerebrospinal fluidIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusMass spectrometryProteomics

Identifiers

PMID36670437
PMCPMC9863210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.