Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670618›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Lifesaving Treatments for the Tiniest Patients-A Narrative Description of Old and New Minimally Invasive Approaches in the Arena of Fetal Surgery.

Thomas Kohl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas KohlGerman Center for Fetal Surgery & Minimally-Invasive Therapy (DZFT), Mannheim University Hospital (UMM), Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal surgery has become a lifesaving reality for hundreds of fetuses each year. The development of a formidable spectrum of safe and effective minimally invasive techniques for fetal interventions since the early 1990s until today has led to an increasing acceptance of novel procedures by both patients and health care providers. From his vast personal experience of more than 20 years as one of the pioneers at the forefront of clinical minimally invasive fetal surgery, the author describes and comments on old and new minimally invasive approaches, highlighting their lifesaving or quality-of-life-improving potential. He provides easy-to-use practical information on how to perform partial amniotic carbon dioxide insufflation (PACI), how to assess lung function in fetuses with pulmonary hypoplasia, how to deal with giant CPAMS, how to insert shunts into fetuses with LUTO and hydrothorax when conventional devices are not available, and how to resuscitate a fetus during fetal cardiac intervention. Furthermore, the author proposes a curriculum for future fetal surgeons, solicits for the centralization of patients, for adequate maternal counseling, for adequate pain management and adequate hygienic conditions during interventions, and last but not least for starting the process of academic recognition of the matured field as an independent specialty. These steps will allow more affected expectant women and their unborn children to gain access to modern minimally invasive fetal surgery and therapy. The opportunity to treat more patients at dedicated centers will also result in more opportunities for the research of rare diseases and conditions, promising even better pre- and postnatal care in the future.

Indexed as

CPAMdiaphragmatic herniafetal interventionfetal surgeryhydrothoraxhyperoxygenationLUTOminimally invasive therapyspina bifida

Identifiers

PMID36670618
PMCPMC9856479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.