Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36675795›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

Imaging Features of Main Hepatic Resections: The Radiologist Challenging.

Carmen Cutolo, Roberta Fusco, Igino Simonetti, Federica De Muzio, Francesca Grassi, Piero Trovato, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Federico Bruno, Nicola Maggialetti, Alessandra Borgheresi and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen CutoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-9969
Igino SimonettiDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Federica De MuzioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Francesca GrassiDivision of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy.
Piero TrovatoDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-0092
Federico BrunoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1444-2585
Nicola MaggialettiDepartment of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Alessandra BorgheresiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-9468
Alessandra BrunoDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Giuditta ChitiItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Eleonora BicciItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1231-6200
Maria Chiara BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Vittorio MieleItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-1567
Antonio BarileDepartment of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-3583
Francesco IzzoDivision of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3093-5408
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITSocietà Italiana di Reumatologia · ITUniversity of Molise · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver resection is still the most effective treatment of primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and of metastatic disease, such as colorectal liver metastases. The type of liver resection (anatomic versus non anatomic resection) depends on different features, mainly on the type of malignancy (primary liver neoplasm versus metastatic lesion), size of tumor, its relation with blood and biliary vessels, and the volume of future liver remnant (FLT). Imaging plays a critical role in postoperative assessment, offering the possibility to recognize normal postoperative findings and potential complications. Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool to use in post-surgical phase. However, computed tomography (CT), due to its comprehensive assessment, allows for a more accurate evaluation and more normal findings than the possible postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or hepatospecific contrast agents remains the best tool for bile duct injuries diagnosis and for ischemic cholangitis evaluation. Consequently, radiologists should be familiar with the surgical approaches for a better comprehension of normal postoperative findings and of postoperative complications.

Indexed as

diagnosishepatic resectionsliverpostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID36675795
PMCPMC9862253
OpenAlexW4315567916

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.