Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36678969›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Morpho-Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Field Pea Genotypes under Terminal Heat Stress.

Vijay Sharma, Chandra Mohan Singh, Vishal Chugh, Kamaluddin, Pawan Kumar Prajapati, Anuj Mishra, Prashant Kaushik, Parmdeep Singh Dhanda, Alpa Yadav, Satyendra

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijay SharmaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6223-2857
Chandra Mohan SinghDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3857-7361
Vishal ChughDepartment of Basic and Social Sciences, College of Horticulture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8883-3610
KamaluddinDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.
Pawan Kumar PrajapatiDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7623-4474
Anuj MishraDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6038-323X
Prashant KaushikIndependent Researcher, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-2849
Parmdeep Singh DhandaDepartment of Biochemistry, Punjab Agricultural University, Ferozepur Road, Ludhiana 141027, India.
Alpa YadavDepartment of Chemistry, Ranchi University, Ranchi 834001, India.
SatyendraDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda 210001, India.
Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology · INPunjab Agricultural University · INRanchi University · INUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field pea is one of the important short-duration cool season pulse crops which contributes significantly towards food and nutritional security. Two heat-susceptible (HS) and two heat-tolerant (HT) genotypes were selected from the previous study for further characterization. A significant variation was observed for morpho-physiological traits studied. Principal component analysis explained that first two principal components, i.e., PC1 and PC2 showed 76.5% of the total variance in optimal condition, whereas 91.2% of the total variance was covered by the first two PCs in heat stress environment. The seed yield per plant determined significant and positive association with superoxide dismutase and number of seeds per pod under optimal conditions, whereas under heat stress condition, it was positively associated with number of effective pods per plant, biological yield per plant, proline, pod length, number of seeds per pod, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase. The significant reduction was noticed in the susceptible genotypes, whereas tolerant genotypes showed stable and non-significant reduction in chlorophyll content. Further, minimum cell damage and higher hydrogen peroxide production was noticed in the susceptible genotypes. In addition, the biochemical characterization of HS and HT genotypes revealed that the higher expression of peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase modulates the tolerant responses in HT genotypes. These genotypes were further used in developing heat-tolerant field pea genotypes.

Indexed as

biochemical characterizationchlorophyllfield peaheat stressROS

Identifiers

PMID36678969
PMCPMC9864050
OpenAlexW4313646504

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.