Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679699›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Real-Time Human Motion Tracking by Tello EDU Drone.

Anuparp Boonsongsrikul, Jirapon Eamsaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anuparp BoonsongsrikulDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University Chonburi Campus, Chonburi 20131, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8754-6721
Jirapon EamsaardDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University Chonburi Campus, Chonburi 20131, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human movement tracking is useful in a variety of areas, such as search-and-rescue activities. CCTV and IP cameras are popular as front-end sensors for tracking human motion; however, they are stationary and have limited applicability in hard-to-reach places, such as those where disasters have occurred. Using a drone to discover a person is challenging and requires an innovative approach. In this paper, we aim to present the design and implementation of a human motion tracking method using a Tello EDU drone. The design methodology is carried out in four steps: (1) control panel design; (2) human motion tracking algorithm; (3) notification systems; and (4) communication and distance extension. Intensive experimental results show that the drone implemented by the proposed algorithm performs well in tracking a human at a distance of 2-10 m moving at a speed of 2 m/s. In an experimental field of the size 95×35m2, the drone tracked human motion throughout a whole day, with the best tracking results observed in the morning. The drone was controlled from a laptop using a Wi-Fi router with a maximum horizontal tracking distance of 84.30 m and maximum vertical distance of 13.40 m. The experiment showed an accuracy rate for human movement detection between 96.67 and 100%.

Indexed as

DisastersUnmanned Aerial DevicesAlgorithmsHumansMotionMovementdronemotion trackingrecognition

Identifiers

PMID36679699
PMCPMC9860987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.