Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36679992›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Changes in Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination and Vaccine Uptake during Pandemic.

Ljiljana Markovic-Denic, Vladimir Nikolic, Nevenka Pavlovic, Gorica Maric, Aleksa Jovanovic, Aleksandra Nikolic, Vuk Marusic, Sandra Sipetic Grujicic, Tatjana Pekmezovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ljiljana Markovic-DenicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladimir NikolicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-0216-6392
Nevenka PavlovicCenter for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Public Health of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Gorica MaricInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-2739-142X
Aleksa JovanovicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra NikolicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Vuk MarusicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Sandra Sipetic GrujicicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Tatjana PekmezovicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-1409
University of Belgrade · RSInstitute of Public Health of Serbia · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemic control approach was based on non-pharmacological measures in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by vaccine uptake in the second year. Vaccine uptake depends on the individual attitude toward vaccination. The aim was to assess the changes in attitudes regarding COVID-19 vaccine protection during the pandemic and to determine the vaccination uptake concerning these attitudes. A panel study on COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and vaccination against COVID-19 was conducted in Belgrade, Serbia. The first survey was carried out in May−June 2020, and the second survey was organized in August−September 2021. During the baseline testing performed in 2020, 64.4% of respondents believed that the future vaccine against COVID-19 could protect against the COVID-19 disease, while 9.7% thought that it could not, and 25.9% were unsure. One year later, in the second survey, the percentage of participants with positive attitudes was slightly lower (64.7% vs. 62.5%). However, negative attitudes turned positive in 34% of cases, and 28.9% became unsure about vaccine protection (p < 0.001). Out of the 390 participants included in the study, 79.7% were vaccinated against COVID-19 until follow-up. There is a statistically significant difference in vaccination uptake compared to the baseline attitude about the protection of the COVID-19 vaccine. The main finding of our study is that the majority of participants who were vaccine hesitant during the baseline testing changed their opinion during the follow-up period. Additionally, the baseline attitude about the protection of the COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to be a potential determinant of vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

attitudeCOVID-19follow-upimmunizationpandemicvaccinationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID36679992
PMCPMC9864985
OpenAlexW4313897796

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.