Evidence mapPaperPMID 36683131Full record

Trial reportInternal and emergency medicine2023

Development and assessment of scoring model for ICU stay and mortality prediction after emergency admissions in ischemic heart disease: a retrospective study of MIMIC-IV databases.

Tingting Shu, Jian Huang, Jiewen Deng, Huaqiao Chen, Yang Zhang, Minjie Duan, Yanqing Wang, Xiaofei Hu, Xiaozhu Liu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tingting Shu *Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jian Huang *Graduate School, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Jiewen Deng *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, China.
Huaqiao ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yang ZhangCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Minjie DuanCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yanqing WangThe First College of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaofei Hu *Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30, Gaotan Yanzheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China. harryzonetmmu@163.com.
Xiaozhu Liu *Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 288, Tiantian Avenue, Nan'an District, Chongqing, 400010, China. xiaozhuliu2021@163.com.
Chongqing Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNArmy Medical University · CNGuangxi University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of death and emergency department (ED) admission. We aimed to develop more accurate and straightforward scoring models to optimize the triaging of IHD patients in ED. This was a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database. Scoring models were established by AutoScore formwork based on machine learning algorithm. The predictive power was measured by the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analysis, with the prediction of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, 3d-death, 7d-death, and 30d-death after emergency admission. A total of 8381 IHD patients were included (median patient age, 71 years, 95% CI 62-81; 3035 [36%] female), in which 5867 episodes were randomly assigned to the training set, 838 to validation set, and 1676 to testing set. In total cohort, there were 2551 (30%) patients transferred into ICU; the mortality rates were 1% at 3 days, 3% at 7 days, and 7% at 30 days. In the testing cohort, the areas under the curve of scoring models for shorter and longer term outcomes prediction were 0.7551 (95% CI 0.7297-0.7805) for ICU stay, 0.7856 (95% CI 0.7166-0.8545) for 3d-death, 0.7371 (95% CI 0.6665-0.8077) for 7d-death, and 0.7407 (95% CI 0.6972-0.7842) for 30d-death. This newly accurate and parsimonious scoring models present good discriminative performance for predicting the possibility of transferring to ICU, 3d-death, 7d-death, and 30d-death in IHD patients visiting ED.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMyocardial IschemiaAgedFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesROC CurveEmergency departmentIschemic heart diseaseMachine learningMIMIC-IVScoring model

Identifiers

PMID36683131
OpenAlexW4317706481

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.