ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Signatures and prognostic values of related immune targets in tongue cancer.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omic discovery of SCG5 as a shared driver and prognostic biomarker in head-neck and non-small cell lung cancers.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Omics-Derived Prognostic Biomarkers in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Risk-of-Bias Appraisal and Translational Prioritization.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Study on the expression level of folate receptor γ in thyroid cancer and its association with clinicopathological characteristics.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Screening Differentially Expressed Proteins in Areca Nut-Related Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Tandem Mass Tag Proteomics.International dental journal · 2025Article
- The role of LRRC15-SCG5 in ECM protein binding as a prognostic signature for urothelial carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Innovations in radiotherapy for tongue squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of Porphyromonas gingivalis-infected head and neck cancer cells: Identification of PLAU as a candidate prognostic biomarker.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Identification of pyroptosis-associated genes with diagnostic value in calcific aortic valve disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tongue cancer, as one of the most malignant oral cancers, is highly invasive and has a high risk of recurrence. At present, tongue cancer is not obvious and easy to miss the opportunity for early diagnosis when in the advanced stage. It is important to find markers that can predict the occurrence and progression of tongue cancer. Methods: Bioinformatics analysis plays an important role in the acquisition of marker genes. GEO and TCGA data are very important public databases. In addition to expression data, the TCGA database also contains corresponding clinical data. In this study, we screened three GEO data sets that met the standard, which included GSE13601, GSE34105, and GSE34106. These data sets were combined using the SVA package to prepare the data for differential expression analysis, and then the limma package was used to set the standard to Results: A total of 170 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. In addition, the DEseq package was used for differential expression analysis using the same criteria for samples in the TCGA database. It ended up with 1,589 DEGs (644 upregulated, 945 downregulated). By merging these two sets of DEGs, 5 common upregulated DEGs ( Conclusions: Further functional analysis of the DEGs showed that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.