Evidence mapPaperPMID 36685161Full record

ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2023

2023 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

Kwo-Chang Ueng, Chern-En Chiang, Ting-Hsing Chao, Yen-Wen Wu, Wen-Lieng Lee, Yi-Heng Li, Ke-Hsin Ting, Chun-Hung Su, Hung-Ju Lin, Ta-Chen Su and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kwo-Chang UengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung.
Chern-En ChiangGeneral Clinical Research Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei.
Ting-Hsing ChaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital; College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.
Yen-Wen WuSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei.
Wen-Lieng LeeSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei.
Yi-Heng LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital; College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.
Ke-Hsin TingDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yunlin Christian Hospital, Yunlin.
Chun-Hung SuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung.
Hung-Ju LinCardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Ta-Chen SuCardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Tsun-Jui LiuCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung.
Tsung-Hsien LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung.
Po-Chao HsuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung.
Yu-Chen WangDivision of Cardiology, Asia University Hospital, Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung.
Zhih-Cherng ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Hsu-Lung JenDivision of Cardiology, Cheng Hsin Rehabilitation Medical Center, Taipei.
Po-Lin LinDivision of Cardiology, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu.
Feng-You KoCardiovascular Center, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung.
Hsueh-Wei YenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung.
Wen-Jone ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Min Sheng General Hospital, Taoyuan.
Charles Jia-Yin HouCardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital; Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TWChi Mei Medical Center · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational Taipei University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) covers a wide spectrum from persons who are asymptomatic to those presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and sudden cardiac death. Coronary atherosclerotic disease is a chronic, progressive process that leads to atherosclerotic plaque development and progression within the epicardial coronary arteries. Being a dynamic process, CAD generally presents with a prolonged stable phase, which may then suddenly become unstable and lead to an acute coronary event. Thus, the concept of "stable CAD" may be misleading, as the risk for acute events continues to exist, despite the use of pharmacological therapies and revascularization. Many advances in coronary care have been made, and guidelines from other international societies have been updated. The 2023 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for CAD introduce a new concept that categorizes the disease entity according to its clinical presentation into acute or chronic coronary syndromes (ACS and CCS, respectively). Previously defined as stable CAD, CCS include a heterogeneous population with or without chest pain, with or without prior ACS, and with or without previous coronary revascularization procedures. As cardiologists, we now face the complexity of CAD, which involves not only the epicardial but also the microcirculatory domains of the coronary circulation and the myocardium. New findings about the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis have changed the clinical landscape. After a nearly 50-year ischemia-centric paradigm of coronary stenosis, growing evidence indicates that coronary atherosclerosis and its features are both diagnostic and therapeutic targets beyond obstructive CAD. Taken together, these factors have shifted the clinicians' focus from the functional evaluation of coronary ischemia to the anatomic burden of disease. Research over the past decades has strengthened the case for prevention and optimal medical therapy as central interventions in patients with CCS. Even though functional capacity has clear prognostic implications, it does not include the evaluation of non-obstructive lesions, plaque burden or additional risk-modifying factors beyond epicardial coronary stenosis-driven ischemia. The recommended first-line diagnostic tests for CCS now include coronary computed tomographic angiography, an increasingly used anatomic imaging modality capable of detecting not only obstructive but also non-obstructive coronary plaques that may be missed with stress testing. This non-invasive anatomical modality improves risk assessment and potentially allows for the appropriate allocation of preventive therapies. Initial invasive strategies cannot improve mortality or the risk of myocardial infarction. Emphasis should be placed on optimizing the control of risk factors through preventive measures, and invasive strategies should be reserved for highly selected patients with refractory symptoms, high ischemic burden, high-risk anatomies, and hemodynamically significant lesions. These guidelines provide current evidence-based diagnosis and treatment recommendations. However, the guidelines are not mandatory, and members of the Task Force fully realize that the treatment of CCS should be individualized to address each patient's circumstances. Ultimately, the decision of healthcare professionals is most important in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CoronaryDiagnosisGuidelinesTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36685161
PMCPMC9829849
OpenAlexW4317780090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.