Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686121›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Estimation of Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma Using an Online Calculator at a Tertiary-Level Hospital in Mexico.

María S Aguirre-Madrigal, José G Flores-Vázquez, Gerardo Romero-Luna, Viviana Ramírez-Stubbe, José Javier Morales-Ramírez, Citlali Alfaro-López, Jesús Daniel Rembao-Bojórquez, Sergio Moreno-Jiménez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María S Aguirre-MadrigalNeurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
José G Flores-VázquezNeurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
Gerardo Romero-LunaNeurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
Viviana Ramírez-StubbeNeurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
José Javier Morales-RamírezNeurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
Citlali Alfaro-LópezNeurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
Jesús Daniel Rembao-BojórquezNeuropathology, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, MEX.
Sergio Moreno-JiménezNeurological Center, ABC Medical Center, México City, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The mean survival duration of patients with glioblastoma after diagnosis is 15 months (14-21 months), while progression-free survival is 10 months (+/- one month). Although there are well-defined overall survival statistics for glioblastoma, individual survival prediction remains a challenge. Therefore, there is a need to validate an accessible and cost-effective prognostic tool to provide valuable data for decision-making. This study aims to calculate the mean survival of patients with glioblastoma at a tertiary-level hospital in Mexico using the online glioblastoma survival calculator developed by researchers at Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital and compare it with the actual mean survival. Methodology We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients who received a histopathological diagnosis of glioblastoma from the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" between 2015 and 2021. We included 50 patients aged 20-83 years, with a tumor size of 15-79 mm, and who had died 30 days after surgery. Patient survival was estimated using the online calculator developed at Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital. The estimated mean survival was then compared with the actual mean survival of the patient. A two-tailed equivalence test for paired samples was performed to conduct this comparison. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results The mean age of the sample was 55.5 years (confidence interval (CI) 95%, 52.61-58.71). The mean tumor size in our sample was 49.12 mm (±14.9mm). We identified a difference between the mean estimated survival and the mean actual survival of -1.37 months (CI 95%; range of -3.7 to +0.9). After setting the inferior (IL) and superior limits (SL) at -3.8 and +3.8 months, respectively, we found that the difference between the mean estimated survival and the actual mean survival is within the equivalence interval (IL: p = 0.0453; SL: p = 0.0002). Conclusions The actual survival of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma at the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery was equivalent to the estimated survival calculated by the online prediction calculator developed at Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital. This study validates a practical, cost-effective, and accessible tool for predicting patient survival, contributing to significant support for medical and personal decision-making for glioblastoma management.

Indexed as

glioblastomamachine learningneurooncologyonline calculatoroverall survivalpredictionprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36686121
PMCPMC9848716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.