Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36686254›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Advances in 3D bioprinting technology for functional corneal reconstruction and regeneration.

Shuo Jia, Yashan Bu, Dzi-Shing Aaron Lau, Zhizhen Lin, Tianhao Sun, Weijia William Lu, Sheng Lu, Changshun Ruan, Cheuk-Hung Jonathan Chan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Keratin-Laden Bioink for Corneal Stroma Bioprinting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. 3D Printing Strategies for Bioengineering Human Cornea.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Transforming meat waste into sustainable corneal keratoplasty models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuo JiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yashan BuDepartment of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Dzi-Shing Aaron LauDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zhizhen LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tianhao SunDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Weijia William LuDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sheng LuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Changshun RuanResearch Center for Human Tissues and Organs Degeneration, Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Cheuk-Hung Jonathan ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HKFirst People's Hospital of Yunnan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal transplantation constitutes one of the major treatments in severe cases of corneal diseases. The lack of cornea donors as well as other limitations of corneal transplantation necessitate the development of artificial corneal substitutes. Biosynthetic cornea model using 3D printing technique is promising to generate artificial corneal structure that can resemble the structure of the native human cornea and is applicable for regenerative medicine. Research on bioprinting artificial cornea has raised interest into the wide range of materials and cells that can be utilized as bioinks for optimal clarity, biocompatibility, and tectonic strength. With continued advances in biomaterials science and printing technology, it is believed that bioprinted cornea will eventually achieve a level of clinical functionality and practicality as to replace donated corneal tissues, with their associated limitations such as limited or unsteady supply, and possible infectious disease transmission. Here, we review the literature on bioprinting strategies, 3D corneal modelling, material options, and cellularization strategies in relation to keratoprosthesis design. The progress, limitations and expectations of recent cases of 3D bioprinting of artifial cornea are discussed. An outlook on the rise of 3D bioprinting in corneal reconstruction and regeneration is provided.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingcorneakeratoprosthesisreconstructionregeneration

Identifiers

PMID36686254
PMCPMC9852906
OpenAlexW4313649385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.