ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Assessing temporal differences of baseline body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-height ratio in predicting future diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and Atrial Fibrillation: Current Evidence and Emerging Research Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Sex and age differences in the association between obesity and long-term changes with the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Rural Deqing Cohort Study.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Comparison of the TyG index, TyG-traditional obesity indices, and TyG-novel obesity indices: does increased complexity help in predicting cardiometabolic multimorbidity?Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- General obesity index or central obesity indicators: which is a better predictor of body fat percentage in the first trimester?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Association of cumulative changes in atherogenic index of plasma and its obesity-related derivatives with cardiovascular disease: emphasis on incremental risk of diabetes status.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Central Adiposity Assessed with Body Roundness Index and Mortality: The Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Prospective Cohort.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of cardiometabolic index change on stroke risk in Chinese middle-aged and elderly: a prospective study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Sex-based differences in the predictive significance of the waist circumference glucose index for future diabetes risk.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Body composition markers are more strongly associated with type 2 diabetes than inflammatory markers-Results from the study of health in Pomerania.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Lipids as the link between central obesity and diabetes: perspectives from mediation analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- Lipids as potential mediators linking body mass index to diabetes: evidence from a mediation analysis based on the NAGALA cohort.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Article
- Waist circumference glucose, a novel and effective predictor of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Associations of levels of peripheral blood leukocyte and subtypes with type 2 diabetes: A longitudinal study of Chinese government employees.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Obesity is the prominent modifiable risk factor known to influence the occurrence and progression of diabetes other than age, and the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the predictive value of three simple baseline anthropometric indicators of obesity, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-height ratio (WHtR), for the occurrence of diabetes at different time points in the future. Methods: The study subjects were 12,823 individuals with normoglycemic at baseline who underwent health screening and had measurements of BMI, WC, and WHtR. The outcome of interest was new-onset diabetes during follow-up. Time-dependent receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves of baseline BMI, WC, and WHtR for predicting the risk of diabetes in the next 2 to 12 years were constructed and their area under the ROC curves (AUCs) and corresponding optimal threshold values were calculated for each time point, which were used to compare the accuracy and stability of the above three indicators for predicting the occurrence of diabetes in different future periods. Results: During a median follow-up period of 7.02 years, with a maximum follow-up of 13 years, 320 new-onset diabetes were recorded. After adjusting for confounders and comparing standardized hazard ratios (HRs), WC was shown to be the best simple anthropometric indicator of obesity reflecting diabetes risk in all models, followed by WHtR. Time-dependent ROC analysis showed that WC had the highest AUC in predicting the occurrence of diabetes in the short term (2-5 years), and WHtR had the highest AUC in predicting the occurrence of diabetes in the medium to long term (6-12 years), while in any time point, both WC and WHtR had higher AUC than BMI in predicting future diabetes. In addition, we found relatively larger fluctuations in the thresholds of BMI and WC for predicting diabetes over time, while the thresholds of WHtR consistently remained between 0.47-0.50; comparatively speaking, WHtR may have greater application value in predicting future diabetes. Conclusions: Our analysis sustained that central obesity is a more important predictor of diabetes, and in clinical practice, we proposed measuring WHtR as a useful tool for predicting future diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.