Evidence mapPaperPMID 36688986Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2023

Decisions and Decisional Needs of Canadians From all Provinces and Territories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population-Based Cross-sectional Surveys.

Dawn Stacey, Claire Ludwig, Patrick Archambault, Maureen Smith, Monica Taljaard, Meg Carley, Karine Plourde, Laura Boland, Amédé Gogovor, Ian Graham and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn StaceySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2681-741X
Claire LudwigPatient Partner, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-984X
Patrick ArchambaultDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-6439
Maureen SmithPatient Partner, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2885-7028
Monica TaljaardCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3978-8961
Meg CarleyCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-0908
Karine PlourdeDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8628-3950
Laura BolandCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8680-9844
Amédé GogovorVITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-0442
Ian GrahamCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3669-1216
Daniel KobewkaCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1812-2335
Robert K D McLeanInternational Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8084-4817
Michelle L A NelsonSinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-0298
Brandi Vanderspank-WrightSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-8212
France LégaréDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-6696
University of Ottawa · CAUniversité Laval · CAOttawa Hospital · CACochrane · CAInternational Development Research Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR PJK-175386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNever before COVID-19 had Canadians faced making health-related decisions in a context of significant uncertainty. However, little is known about which type of decisions and the types of difficulties that they faced.

objectiveWe sought to identify the health-related decisions and decisional needs of Canadians.

methodsOur study was codesigned by researchers and knowledge users (eg, patients, clinicians). Informed by the CHERRIES (the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) reporting guideline, we conducted 2 online surveys of random samples drawn from the Leger consumer panel of 400,000 Canadians. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) who received or were receiving any health services in the past 12 months for themselves (adults) or for their child (parent) or senior with cognitive impairment (caregiver). We assessed decisions and decisional needs using questions informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, including decisional conflict and decision regret using the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), respectively. Descriptive statistics were conducted for adults who had decided for themselves or on behalf of someone else. Significant decisional conflict (SDC) was defined as a total DCS score of >37.5 out of 100, and significant decision regret was defined as a total DRS score of >25 out of 100.

resultsFrom May 18 to June 4, 2021, 14,459 adults and 6542 parents/caregivers were invited to participate. The invitation view rate was 15.5% (2236/14,459) and 28.3% (1850/6542); participation rate, 69.3% (1549/2236) and 28.7% (531/1850); and completion rate, 97.3% (1507/1549) and 95.1% (505/531), respectively. The survey was completed by 1454 (97.3%) adults and 438 (95.1%) parents/caregivers in English (1598/1892, 84.5%) or French (294/1892, 15.5%). Respondents from all 10 Canadian provinces and the northern territories represented a range of ages, education levels, civil statuses, ethnicities, and annual household income. Of 1892 respondents, 541 (28.6%) self-identified as members of marginalized groups. The most frequent decisions were (adults vs parents/caregivers) as follows: COVID-19 vaccination (490/1454, 33.7%, vs 87/438, 19.9%), managing a health condition (253/1454, 17.4%, vs 47/438, 10.7%), other COVID-19 decisions (158/1454, 10.9%, vs 85/438, 19.4%), mental health care (128/1454, 8.8%, vs 27/438, 6.2%), and medication treatments (115/1454, 7.9%, vs 23/438, 5.3%). Caregivers also reported decisions about moving family members to/from nursing or retirement homes (48/438, 11.0%). Adults (323/1454, 22.2%) and parents/caregivers (95/438, 21.7%) had SDC. Factors making decisions difficult were worrying about choosing the wrong option (557/1454, 38.3%, vs 184/438, 42.0%), worrying about getting COVID-19 (506/1454, 34.8%, vs 173/438, 39.5%), public health restrictions (427/1454, 29.4%, vs 158/438, 36.1%), information overload (300/1454, 20.6%, vs 77/438, 17.6%), difficulty separating misinformation from scientific evidence (297/1454, 20.4%, vs 77/438, 17.6%), and difficulty discussing decisions with clinicians (224/1454, 15.4%, vs 51/438, 11.6%). For 1318 (90.6%) adults and 366 (83.6%) parents/caregivers who had decided, 353 (26.8%) and 125 (34.2%) had significant decision regret, respectively. In addition, 1028 (50%) respondents made their decision alone without considering the opinions of clinicians.

conclusionsDuring COVID-19, Canadians who responded to the survey faced several new health-related decisions. Many reported unmet decision-making needs, resulting in SDC and decision regret. Interventions can be designed to address their decisional needs and support patients facing new health-related decisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision MakingAdultCanadaChildCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinescaregiversCOVID-19decisional conflictdecision regrethealth carehealth care decisionshealth outcomeolder adultspandemic preparednessparentspublic health decisionpublic health policyshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36688986
PMCPMC10131685
OpenAlexW4317645571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.