Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692701›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2023

Exploring the Impact of Covid-19-Related Perceptions on Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in an International Gastrointestinal Cohort Over Time Guided by the Common Sense Model.

Simon R Knowles, Stephan P Möller, Andreas Stengel, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Nuno Ferreira, Inês A Trindade, Anna Mokrowiecka, Johan Burisch, Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta, Charles N Bernstein and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Simon R KnowlesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia. sknowles@swin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-1000
Stephan P MöllerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Andreas StengelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Antonina Mikocka-WalusSchool of Psychology, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Nuno FerreiraSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Inês A TrindadeDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna MokrowieckaDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Johan BurischGastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Manuel Barreiro-de AcostaIBD Unit. Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Charles N BernsteinUniversity of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre and Department of Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Bobby LoGastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark.
David SkvarcSchool of Psychology, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Deakin University · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMedical University of Lodz · PLUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Nicosia · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine changes in COVID-19 and illness-related perceptions, gastrointestinal symptoms, coping, catastrophising, psychological distress, and QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 831 adults with a gastrointestinal condition completed an online questionnaire at baseline (May-October 2020). Of those, 270 (32.5%) participants (85.2% female, mean age = 47.3 years) provided follow-up data (March-May 2021). Repeated-measures multiple analysis of variance and a cross-lagged panel model were used to test the study hypotheses. Gastrointestinal symptoms and COVID-19 perceptions at follow-up were strongly predicted by their baseline values, while illness perceptions were predicted by baseline gastrointestinal symptoms. Cross-lagged relationships indicated a reciprocal relationship between gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological distress. Moreover, gastrointestinal symptoms had substantial predictive utility, strongly predicting future gastrointestinal symptoms, and to a lesser extent, more negative illness perceptions, greater psychological distress, and greater use of adaptive coping strategies across time.

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCommon sense modelCOVID-19, quality of lifeCross-lagged panel modelGastrointestinal

Identifiers

PMID36692701
PMCPMC9872753
OpenAlexW4317871070

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.