Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693887›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

Brain Data Standards - A method for building data-driven cell-type ontologies.

Shawn Zheng Kai Tan, Huseyin Kir, Brian D Aevermann, Tom Gillespie, Nomi Harris, Michael J Hawrylycz, Nikolas L Jorstad, Ed S Lein, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Jeremy A Miller and 10 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Navigating open-source waters: the pharmaceutical industry's role in bioontology development.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Shawn Zheng Kai TanEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7258-9596
Huseyin KirEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Brian D AevermannJ. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI), La Jolla, CA, USA.
Tom GillespieUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Nomi HarrisLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-3707
Michael J HawrylyczAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nikolas L JorstadAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ed S LeinAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-6552
Nicolas MatentzogluSemanticly Ltd, Athens, United Kingdom.
Jeremy A MillerAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tyler S MollenkopfAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher J MungallLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Patrick L RayAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Raymond E A SanchezAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian StaatsAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-3792
Jim VermillionAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ambika YadavAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yun ZhangJ. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI), La Jolla, CA, USA.
Richard H ScheuermannJ. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI), La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-892X
David Osumi-SutherlandEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom. davidos@ebi.ac.uk.

Funding

A Community Resource for Single Cell Data in the BrainU24MH114827 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI HAWRYLYCZ, MICHAEL, MARTONE, MARYANN E · 2017 to 2021
$14.4M
A Community Framework for Data-driven Brain Transcriptomic Cell Type Definition, Ontology, and NomenclatureRF1MH123220 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI HAWRYLYCZ, MICHAEL, LEIN, ED · 2020 to 2020
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123220NIMH NIH HHS U24 MH114827U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) 1RF1MH123220-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale single-cell 'omics profiling is being used to define a complete catalogue of brain cell types, something that traditional methods struggle with due to the diversity and complexity of the brain. But this poses a problem: How do we organise such a catalogue - providing a standard way to refer to the cell types discovered, linking their classification and properties to supporting data? Cell ontologies provide a partial solution to these problems, but no existing ontology schemas support the definition of cell types by direct reference to supporting data, classification of cell types using classifications derived directly from data, or links from cell types to marker sets along with confidence scores. Here we describe a generally applicable schema that solves these problems and its application in a semi-automated pipeline to build a data-linked extension to the Cell Ontology representing cell types in the Primary Motor Cortex of humans, mice and marmosets. The methods and resulting ontology are designed to be scalable and applicable to similar whole-brain atlases currently in preparation.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesBrainAnimalsCallithrixData CollectionHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID36693887
PMCPMC9873614

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.