ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
Proposal of a new diagnostic algorithm for adult-onset Still's disease.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncertainty in the diagnosis and prognosis of adult-onset Still's disease.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- Disease activity score for still's disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Review
- Diagnosing and Treating Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult-Onset Still's Disease as Part of the Still's Disease Continuum.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024Review
- Recent advances and evolving concepts in Still's disease.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Review
- Indices and ferritin level that predict organ involvement in adult-onset Still's disease.Biomarkers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was performed to develop a new diagnostic algorithm for adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD).
methodsWe conducted a multicenter prospective nationwide case-control study in tertiary Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, and Infectious Diseases departments, to include successively patients with suspected AOSD based on the presence of two or more major criteria of Yamaguchi and/or Fautrel classifications. Patients were classified as AOSD or controls according to a predefined procedure. A receiving operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best cutoff value of the points-based score for disease classification. A diagnostic algorithm was developed to help the physician in the diagnostic approach.
resultsA total of 160 patients were included, 80 patients with AOSD and 60 controls with different diagnoses. Twenty patients with incomplete data were excluded. In the multivariate analysis, 6 items remained independently associated with AOSD diagnosis: typical rash (OR: 24.01, 3 points), fever ≥ 39 °C (OR: 17.34, 3 points), pharyngitis (OR: 10.23, 2 points), arthritis (OR: 9.01, 2 points), NLR ≥ 4 (OR: 11.10, 2 points), and glycosylated ferritin ≤ 20% (OR: 1.59, 1 point). AOSD should be considered if the patient satisfies 7 points with a sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 93.3%, and accuracy of 92.8% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99]). The present points-based score was more accurate and sensitive than the Yamaguchi classification (78.8%, 92.5%, p = 0.01) and Fautrel classification (76.3%, 92.5%, p = 0.004). A typical rash associated with a points-based score ≥ 7 points leads to a very likely disease.
conclusionThe proposed new algorithm could be a good diagnostic tool for adult-onset Still's disease in clinical practice and research. Key Points • A diagnostic algorithm was performed to help the physician in the diagnostic approach of AOSD. • The points-based score included in this algorithm had a high sensitivity and accuracy. • This diagnostic algorithm can be useful in the clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.